199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28324136)
1. The inimitable mouth: task-dependent kinematic differences are independent of terminal precision.
Flindall JW; Gonzalez CLR
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1945-1952. PubMed ID: 28324136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eating interrupted: the effect of intent on hand-to-mouth actions.
Flindall JW; Gonzalez CL
J Neurophysiol; 2014 Oct; 112(8):2019-25. PubMed ID: 24990561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence for right-hand feeding biases in a left-handed population.
Flindall JW; Stone KD; Gonzalez CL
Laterality; 2015 May; 20(3):287-305. PubMed ID: 25256315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The destination defines the journey: an examination of the kinematics of hand-to-mouth movements.
Flindall JW; Gonzalez CL
J Neurophysiol; 2016 Nov; 116(5):2105-2113. PubMed ID: 27512020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Kinematics of ventrally mediated grasp-to-eat actions: right-hand advantage is dependent on dorsal stream input.
Beke C; Flindall JW; Gonzalez CLR
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1621-1630. PubMed ID: 29589079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Children's bilateral advantage for grasp-to-eat actions becomes unimanual by age 10 years.
Flindall JW; Gonzalez CL
J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 May; 133():57-71. PubMed ID: 25765884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the evolution of handedness: evidence for feeding biases.
Flindall JW; Gonzalez CL
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e78967. PubMed ID: 24236078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the Neurocircuitry of Grasping: The influence of action intent on kinematic asymmetries in reach-to-grasp actions.
Flindall J; Gonzalez CLR
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Oct; 81(7):2217-2236. PubMed ID: 31290131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hear speech, change your reach: changes in the left-hand grasp-to-eat action during speech processing.
van Rootselaar NA; Flindall JW; Gonzalez CLR
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Dec; 236(12):3267-3277. PubMed ID: 30229305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The left cerebral hemisphere may be dominant for the control of bimanual symmetric reach-to-grasp movements.
Blinch J; Flindall JW; Smaga Ł; Jung K; Gonzalez CL
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 237(12):3297-3311. PubMed ID: 31664489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Manual asymmetries in the kinematics of a reach-to-grasp action.
Flindall JW; Doan JB; Gonzalez CL
Laterality; 2014; 19(4):489-507. PubMed ID: 24350797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tactile interference in visually guided reach-to-grasp movements.
Kritikos A; Beresford M
Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11976754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Left handedness does not extend to visually guided precision grasping.
Gonzalez CL; Whitwell RL; Morrissey B; Ganel T; Goodale MA
Exp Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 182(2):275-9. PubMed ID: 17717653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study.
Grosskopf A; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):230-40. PubMed ID: 16078023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Altered precision grasping in stumptail macaques after fasciculus cuneatus lesions.
Glendinning DS; Cooper BY; Vierck CJ; Leonard CM
Somatosens Mot Res; 1992; 9(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 1595322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender differences in non-standard mapping tasks: A kinematic study using pantomimed reach-to-grasp actions.
Copley-Mills J; Connolly JD; Cavina-Pratesi C
Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():244-254. PubMed ID: 27410715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shared right-hemispheric representations of sensorimotor goals in dynamic task environments.
Le A; Wall FB; Lin G; Arunthavarajah R; Niemeier M
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):977-987. PubMed ID: 30694342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.
Grant S
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3489-505. PubMed ID: 26298046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On-line visual control of grasping movements.
Volcic R; Domini F
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 234(8):2165-77. PubMed ID: 26996387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ecological validity of manual grasping movements in an everyday-like grocery shopping task.
Kim K; Bock O
Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1169-1177. PubMed ID: 30805748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
