These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28324144)

  • 21. The Governance of Indigenous Natural Products in Namibia: A Policy Network Analysis.
    Ndeinoma A; Wiersum KF; Arts B
    Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 62(1):29-44. PubMed ID: 29313070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Governance Options to Enhance Ecosystem Services in Cocoa, Soy, Tropical Timber and Palm Oil Value Chains.
    Ingram V; van den Berg J; van Oorschot M; Arets E; Judge L
    Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 62(1):128-142. PubMed ID: 29411075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Top-down, Bottom-up and Sideways: The Multilayered Complexities of Multi-level Actors Shaping Forest Governance and REDD+ Arrangements in Madre de Dios, Peru.
    Rodriguez-Ward D; Larson AM; Ruesta HG
    Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 62(1):98-116. PubMed ID: 29299626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Working together: A call for inclusive conservation.
    Tallis H; Lubchenco J
    Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7525):27-8. PubMed ID: 25373659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes.
    Lienert J; Schnetzer F; Ingold K
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Aug; 125():134-48. PubMed ID: 23660534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploring Institutional Mechanisms for Scientific Input into the Management Cycle of the National Protected Area Network of Peru: Gaps and Opportunities.
    López-Rodríguez MD; Castro H; Arenas M; Requena-Mullor JM; Cano A; Valenzuela E; Cabello J
    Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 60(6):1022-1041. PubMed ID: 28887588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Identifying mechanisms for facilitating knowledge to action strategies targeting the built environment.
    Fazli GS; Creatore MI; Matheson FI; Guilcher S; Kaufman-Shriqui V; Manson H; Johns A; Booth GL
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Jan; 17(1):1. PubMed ID: 28049454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. From State-controlled to Polycentric Governance in Forest Landscape Restoration: The Case of the Ecological Forest Purchase Program in Yong'an Municipality of China.
    Long H; Liu J; Tu C; Fu Y
    Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 62(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 29297091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Who, when, and how? Marine planning stakeholder involvement preferences--a case study of the Solent, United Kingdom.
    Maguire B; Potts J; Fletcher S
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2011 Nov; 62(11):2288-92. PubMed ID: 21903229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Democratizing wildfire strategies. Do you realize what it means? Insights from a participatory process in the Montseny region (Catalonia, Spain).
    Otero I; Castellnou M; González I; Arilla E; Castell L; Castellví J; Sánchez F; Nielsen JØ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204806. PubMed ID: 30325926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stakeholder Participation in Freshwater Monitoring and Evaluation Programs: Applying Thresholds of Potential Concern within Environmental Flows.
    Conallin J; McLoughlin CA; Campbell J; Knight R; Bright T; Fisher I
    Environ Manage; 2018 Mar; 61(3):408-420. PubMed ID: 28948371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of marine spatial planning requires fit for purpose monitoring strategies.
    Stelzenmüller V; Cormier R; Gee K; Shucksmith R; Gubbins M; Yates KL; Morf A; Nic Aonghusa C; Mikkelsen E; Tweddle JF; Pecceu E; Kannen A; Clarke SA
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 278(Pt 2):111545. PubMed ID: 33202370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving integration for integrated coastal zone management: an eight country study.
    Portman ME; Esteves LS; Le XQ; Khan AZ
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Nov; 439():194-201. PubMed ID: 23063925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Benefits, efforts and risks of participants in landscape co-management: an analytical framework and results from two case studies in Austria.
    Enengel B; Penker M; Muhar A; Williams R
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Apr; 92(4):1256-67. PubMed ID: 21216520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A sustainable planet needs scientists to think ahead.
    Seitzinger S
    Nature; 2010 Dec; 468(7324):601. PubMed ID: 21124410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Global climate agreement: After the talks.
    Victor DG; Leape JP
    Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7579):439-41. PubMed ID: 26607527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Enabling multi-faceted measures of success for protected area management in Trinidad and Tobago.
    Granderson AA
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 Aug; 34(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 21555042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using offsets to mitigate environmental impacts of major projects: A stakeholder analysis.
    Martin N; Evans M; Rice J; Lodhia S; Gibbons P
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 179():58-65. PubMed ID: 27173891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Collaborative Approach for Scoping Ecosystem Services with Stakeholders: The Case of Arrábida Natural Park.
    Lopes R; Videira N
    Environ Manage; 2016 Aug; 58(2):323-42. PubMed ID: 27220337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using Optimal Land-Use Scenarios to Assess Trade-Offs between Conservation, Development, and Social Values.
    Adams VM; Pressey RL; Álvarez-Romero JG
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0158350. PubMed ID: 27362347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.