These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28324708)

  • 1. Removal of haloacetic acids from swimming pool water by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration.
    Yang L; She Q; Wan MP; Wang R; Chang VW; Tang CY
    Water Res; 2017 Jun; 116():116-125. PubMed ID: 28324708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of calcium ions on the removal of haloacetic acids from swimming pool water by nanofiltration: mechanisms and implications.
    Yang L; Zhou J; She Q; Wan MP; Wang R; Chang VW; Tang CY
    Water Res; 2017 Mar; 110():332-341. PubMed ID: 28063295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rejection of haloacetic acids in water by multi-stage reverse osmosis: Efficiency, mechanisms, and influencing factors.
    Wang L; Sun Y; Chen B
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():383-392. PubMed ID: 30056322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of antibiotics and estrogens by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Yang L; Xia C; Jiang J; Chen X; Zhou Y; Yuan C; Bai L; Meng S; Cao G
    J Hazard Mater; 2024 Jan; 461():132628. PubMed ID: 37783143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Dolar D; Vuković A; Asperger D; Kosutić K
    J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(8):1299-307. PubMed ID: 22128537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Lin YL; Chiou JH; Lee CH
    J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 277():102-9. PubMed ID: 24560524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
    Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of commercial nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane filtration to remove per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Effects of transmembrane pressures and water matrices.
    Ma Q; Lei Q; Liu F; Song Z; Khusid B; Zhang W
    Water Environ Res; 2024 Feb; 96(2):e10983. PubMed ID: 38291820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
    Yoon J; Amy G; Chung J; Sohn J; Yoon Y
    Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
    Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rejection of trace organic compounds by high-pressure membranes.
    Kim TU; Amy G; Drewes JE
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):335-44. PubMed ID: 16003994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tight ceramic UF membrane as RO pre-treatment: the role of electrostatic interactions on phosphate rejection.
    Shang R; Verliefde AR; Hu J; Zeng Z; Lu J; Kemperman AJ; Deng H; Nijmeijer K; Heijman SG; Rietveld LC
    Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():498-507. PubMed ID: 24156950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rejection efficiency of water quality parameters by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes.
    Peng W; Escobar IC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Oct; 37(19):4435-41. PubMed ID: 14572097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of RO/NF membranes at the removal of veterinary antibiotics.
    Dolar D; Vuković A; Ašperger D; Košutić K
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 22233911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rejection of pharmaceuticals by forward osmosis membranes.
    Jin X; Shan J; Wang C; Wei J; Tang CY
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Aug; 227-228():55-61. PubMed ID: 22640821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An investigation of desalination by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and integrated (hybrid NF/RO) membranes employed in brackish water treatment.
    Talaeipour M; Nouri J; Hassani AH; Mahvi AH
    J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2017; 15():18. PubMed ID: 28736617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Removal of multiple pesticides from water by different types of membranes.
    Seah MQ; Ng ZC; Lai GS; Lau WJ; Al-Ghouti MA; Alias NH; Ismail AF
    Chemosphere; 2024 May; 356():141960. PubMed ID: 38604517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the effect of charge density in the active layers of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes on the rejection of arsenic(III) and potassium iodide.
    Coronell O; Mi B; Mariñas BJ; Cahill DG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):420-8. PubMed ID: 23199291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Removal of organic contaminants by RO and NF membranes.
    Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
    J Memb Sci; 2005 Sep; 261(1-2):76-86. PubMed ID: 16134262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.