These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments. Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions. Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions? Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Ausdemore M; Buscaglia J Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110542. PubMed ID: 33147525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of AFIS "sufficiency" in friction ridge examination. Neumann C; Armstrong DE; Wu T Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():114-125. PubMed ID: 27111746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method for measuring the quality of friction skin impression evidence: Method development and validation. Swofford H; Champod C; Koertner A; Eldridge H; Salyards M Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110703. PubMed ID: 33524851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing the accuracy and reliability of palmar friction ridge comparisons - A black box study. Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110457. PubMed ID: 33239260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mind-set - How bias leads to errors in friction ridge comparisons. Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110545. PubMed ID: 33339631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]