These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28324769)

  • 1. Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():65-75. PubMed ID: 28324769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding the sufficiency of information for latent fingerprint value determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Kiebuzinski GI; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):99-106. PubMed ID: 23394968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in latent fingerprint examiners' markup between analysis and comparison.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Feb; 247():54-61. PubMed ID: 25553355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110179. PubMed ID: 25372036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprints.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():89-99. PubMed ID: 27046517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining and expanding the friction ridge value decision.
    Eldridge H; DeDonno M; Furrer J; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Sep; 314():110408. PubMed ID: 32731198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterizing missed identifications and errors in latent fingerprint comparisons using eye-tracking data.
    Busey TA; Heise N; Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251674. PubMed ID: 34029319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments.
    Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions?
    Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Ausdemore M; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110542. PubMed ID: 33147525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of AFIS "sufficiency" in friction ridge examination.
    Neumann C; Armstrong DE; Wu T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():114-125. PubMed ID: 27111746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for measuring the quality of friction skin impression evidence: Method development and validation.
    Swofford H; Champod C; Koertner A; Eldridge H; Salyards M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110703. PubMed ID: 33524851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the accuracy and reliability of palmar friction ridge comparisons - A black box study.
    Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110457. PubMed ID: 33239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mind-set - How bias leads to errors in friction ridge comparisons.
    Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110545. PubMed ID: 33339631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of ordinal outcomes in forensic black-box studies.
    Arora HM; Kaplan-Damary N; Stern HS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jan; 354():111909. PubMed ID: 38104395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How often do fingerprint examiners disagree in routine casework?
    O'Connor R; Chapman A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 361():112139. PubMed ID: 38971142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of human-technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts.
    Dror IE; Wertheim K; Fraser-Mackenzie P; Walajtys J
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 22212067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the clarity of friction ridge impressions.
    Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Mar; 226(1-3):106-17. PubMed ID: 23313600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are forensic scientists too risk averse?
    Mannering WM; Vogelsang MD; Busey TA; Mannering FL
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1377-1400. PubMed ID: 33748945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.