These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28324769)

  • 21. Utilizing AFIS searching tools to reduce errors in fingerprint casework.
    Langenburg G; Hall C; Rosemarie Q
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():123-133. PubMed ID: 26295930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination.
    Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jul; 324():110823. PubMed ID: 34004529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Integration of pore features into the evaluation of fingerprint evidence.
    Anthonioz A; Champod C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 24148081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Utility of Expanded Conclusion Scales During Latent Print Examinations.
    Carter KE; Vogelsang MD; Vanderkolk J; Busey T
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1141-1154. PubMed ID: 32134513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On relative distortion in fingerprint comparison.
    Kalka ND; Hicklin RA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Nov; 244():78-84. PubMed ID: 25216456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gaze behavior and cognitive states during fingerprint target group localization.
    Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Busey TA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Apr; 4(1):12. PubMed ID: 30953242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy and reproducibility of forensic tire examination decisions.
    Richetelli N; LeMay J; Dunagan KM; Parks CL; Hicklin RA; Chapman WJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 May; 358():112009. PubMed ID: 38581823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The permanence of friction ridge skin and persistence of friction ridge skin and impressions: A comprehensive review and new results.
    Monson KL; Roberts MA; Knorr KB; Ali S; Meagher SB; Biggs K; Blume P; Brandelli D; Marzioli A; Reneau R; Tarasi F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():111-131. PubMed ID: 30784948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Forensic comparison and matching of fingerprints: using quantitative image measures for estimating error rates through understanding and predicting difficulty.
    Kellman PJ; Mnookin JL; Erlikhman G; Garrigan P; Ghose T; Mettler E; Charlton D; Dror IE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e94617. PubMed ID: 24788812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting suitability of finger marks using machine learning techniques and examiner annotations.
    Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110712. PubMed ID: 33601318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Expertise in fingerprint identification.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1519-30. PubMed ID: 23786258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Data on the interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprints.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Data Brief; 2016 Sep; 8():158-90. PubMed ID: 27294185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Resolving latent conflict: What happens when latent print examiners enter the cage?
    Rairden A; Garrett BL; Kelley S; Murrie D; Castillo A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():215-222. PubMed ID: 29933202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of forensic footwear examiner decisions.
    Austin Hicklin R; McVicker BC; Parks C; LeMay J; Richetelli N; Smith M; Buscaglia J; Perlman RS; Peters EM; Eckenrode BA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Oct; 339():111418. PubMed ID: 35987091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validating strength-of-support conclusion scales for fingerprint, footwear, and toolmark impressions.
    Busey T; Klutzke M; Nuzzi A; Vanderkolk J
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):936-954. PubMed ID: 35322424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What types of information can and do latent print examiners review? A survey of practicing examiners.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Mar; 344():111598. PubMed ID: 36801503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does image editing improve the quality of latent prints? An analysis of image-editing techniques in one crime laboratory.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S; Hong A; Mejia R
    Sci Justice; 2023 Jan; 63(1):109-115. PubMed ID: 36631175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measuring the rarity of core-delta distances in fingerprint patterns in the Dutch population.
    de Jongh A; Lubach AR; Lie Kwie SL; Loadsman-Wammes FDLV; Alberink I
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):94-116. PubMed ID: 37723644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Latent fingerprint matching.
    Jain AK; Feng J
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2011 Jan; 33(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 21088321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.