These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28324943)

  • 1. Overcoming spatio-temporal limitations using dynamically scaled in vitro PC-MRI - A flow field comparison to true-scale computer simulations of idealized, stented and patient-specific left main bifurcations.
    Beier S; Ormiston J; Webster M; Cater J; Norris S; Medrano-Gracia P; Young A; Gilbert K; Cowan B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1220-1223. PubMed ID: 28324943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamically scaled phantom phase contrast MRI compared to true-scale computational modeling of coronary artery flow.
    Beier S; Ormiston JA; Webster MW; Cater JE; Norris SE; Medrano-Gracia P; Young AA; Cowan BR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):983-92. PubMed ID: 27042817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards validating stent induced micro flow patterns in left main coronary artery bifurcations.
    Masoud-Ansari S; Ormiston J; Webster M; Pontre B; Cowan B; Beier S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5749-5752. PubMed ID: 31947158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of bifurcation angle and other anatomical characteristics on blood flow - A computational study of non-stented and stented coronary arteries.
    Beier S; Ormiston J; Webster M; Cater J; Norris S; Medrano-Gracia P; Young A; Cowan B
    J Biomech; 2016 Jun; 49(9):1570-1582. PubMed ID: 27062590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI.
    Rispoli VC; Nielsen JF; Nayak KS; Carvalho JL
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Nov; 14():110. PubMed ID: 26611470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A framework for computational fluid dynamic analyses of patient-specific stented coronary arteries from optical coherence tomography images.
    Migliori S; Chiastra C; Bologna M; Montin E; Dubini G; Aurigemma C; Fedele R; Burzotta F; Mainardi L; Migliavacca F
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():105-116. PubMed ID: 28711588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alterations in regional vascular geometry produced by theoretical stent implantation influence distributions of wall shear stress: analysis of a curved coronary artery using 3D computational fluid dynamics modeling.
    LaDisa JF; Olson LE; Douglas HA; Warltier DC; Kersten JR; Pagel PS
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Jun; 5():40. PubMed ID: 16780592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm.
    van Ooij P; Potters WV; Guédon A; Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 23417769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of scaled boundary conditions on wall shear stress computations in atherosclerotic human coronary bifurcations.
    Schrauwen JT; Schwarz JC; Wentzel JJ; van der Steen AF; Siebes M; Gijsen FJ
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2016 May; 310(10):H1304-12. PubMed ID: 26945083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CFD validation using in-vitro MRI velocity data - Methods for data matching and CFD error quantification.
    Wüstenhagen C; John K; Langner S; Brede M; Grundmann S; Bruschewski M
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Apr; 131():104230. PubMed ID: 33545507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benchmark for Numerical Models of Stented Coronary Bifurcation Flow.
    García Carrascal P; García García J; Sierra Pallares J; Castro Ruiz F; Manuel Martín FJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2018 Sep; 140(9):. PubMed ID: 29570758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Haemodynamics in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm according to experimental and numerical approaches: A comparison of PIV, CFD and PC-MRI.
    Li Y; Yoneyama Y; Isoda H; Terada M; Kosugi T; Kosugi T; Zhang M; Ohta M
    Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 32568138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD.
    Roloff C; Stucht D; Beuing O; Berg P
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 30061369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reconciling PC-MRI and CFD: An in-vitro study.
    Puiseux T; Sewonu A; Meyrignac O; Rousseau H; Nicoud F; Mendez S; Moreno R
    NMR Biomed; 2019 May; 32(5):e4063. PubMed ID: 30747461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards multi-modal data fusion for super-resolution and denoising of 4D-Flow MRI.
    Perez-Raya I; Fathi MF; Baghaie A; Sacho RH; Koch KM; D'Souza RM
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Sep; 36(9):e3381. PubMed ID: 32627366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the coupling of magnetic resonance imaging velocity measurements with computational fluid dynamics in a U bend.
    Glor FP; Westenberg JJ; Vierendeels J; Danilouchkine M; Verdonck P
    Artif Organs; 2002 Jul; 26(7):622-35. PubMed ID: 12081521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Haemodynamic mechanism of formation and distribution of coronary atherosclerosis: A lesion-specific model.
    Feng J; Wang N; Wang Y; Tang X; Yuan J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Nov; 234(11):1187-1196. PubMed ID: 32748686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MRI measurement of wall shear stress vectors in bifurcation models and comparison with CFD predictions.
    Köhler U; Marshall I; Robertson MB; Long Q; Xu XY; Hoskins PR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Nov; 14(5):563-73. PubMed ID: 11747008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3D phase contrast MRI in models of human airways: Validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations of steady inspiratory flow.
    Collier GJ; Kim M; Chung Y; Wild JM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1400-1409. PubMed ID: 29630757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimizing the blood velocity differences between phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics simulation in cerebral arteries and aneurysms.
    Mohd Adib MAH; Ii S; Watanabe Y; Wada S
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Sep; 55(9):1605-1619. PubMed ID: 28161877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.