348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28325937)
1. Discriminating between natural and anthropogenic earthquakes: insights from the Emilia Romagna (Italy) 2012 seismic sequence.
Albano M; Barba S; Tarabusi G; Saroli M; Stramondo S
Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7(1):282. PubMed ID: 28325937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Remote triggering of deep earthquakes in the 2002 Tonga sequences.
Tibi R; Wiens DA; Inoue H
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6951):921-5. PubMed ID: 12931183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks.
Chen X; Nakata N; Pennington C; Haffener J; Chang JC; He X; Zhan Z; Ni S; Walter JI
Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4945. PubMed ID: 28694472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhanced remote earthquake triggering at fluid-injection sites in the midwestern United States.
van der Elst NJ; Savage HM; Keranen KM; Abers GA
Science; 2013 Jul; 341(6142):164-7. PubMed ID: 23846900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Paleoseismic study of the Kamishiro Fault on the northern segment of the Itoigawa-Shizuoka Tectonic Line, Japan.
Lin A; Sano M; Wang M; Yan B; Bian D; Fueta R; Hosoya T
J Seismol; 2017; 21(4):683-703. PubMed ID: 28729808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clock advance and magnitude limitation through fault interaction: the case of the 2016 central Italy earthquake sequence.
Pino NA; Convertito V; Madariaga R
Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):5005. PubMed ID: 30899081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The November 2017
Grigoli F; Cesca S; Rinaldi AP; Manconi A; López-Comino JA; Clinton JF; Westaway R; Cauzzi C; Dahm T; Wiemer S
Science; 2018 Jun; 360(6392):1003-1006. PubMed ID: 29700226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma.
Zhai G; Shirzaei M; Manga M; Chen X
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Aug; 116(33):16228-16233. PubMed ID: 31358640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Was the M
Hough SE; Tsai VC; Walker R; Aminzadeh F
J Seismol; 2017; 21(6):1613-1621. PubMed ID: 29200935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence.
Kato A; Nakamura K; Hiyama Y
Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2016; 92(8):358-371. PubMed ID: 27725474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Remote triggering of fault-strength changes on the San Andreas fault at Parkfield.
Taira T; Silver PG; Niu F; Nadeau RM
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7264):636-9. PubMed ID: 19794490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-episodes earthquake migration in the Bohai-Zhangjiakou Fault Zone, North China: Insights from numerical modeling.
Shao B; Hou G; Shen J
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251606. PubMed ID: 34010347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Did the September 2010 (Darfield) earthquake trigger the February 2011 (Christchurch) event?
Stramondo S; Kyriakopoulos C; Bignami C; Chini M; Melini D; Moro M; Picchiani M; Saroli M; Boschi E
Sci Rep; 2011; 1():98. PubMed ID: 22355616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 landers, california, earthquake.
Hill DP; Reasenberg PA; Michael A; Arabaz WJ; Beroza G; Brumbaugh D; Brune JN; Castro R; Davis S; Depolo D; Ellsworth WL; Gomberg J; Harmsen S; House L; Jackson SM; Johnston MJ; Jones L; Keller R; Malone S; Munguia L; Nava S; Pechmann JC; Sanford A; Simpson RW; Smith RB; Stark M; Stickney M; Vidal A; Walter S; Wong V; Zollweg J
Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5114):1617-23. PubMed ID: 17810202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hydrogeochemical changes before and during the 2016 Amatrice-Norcia seismic sequence (central Italy).
Barberio MD; Barbieri M; Billi A; Doglioni C; Petitta M
Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11735. PubMed ID: 28916778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Triggering of earthquake aftershocks by dynamic stresses.
Kilb D; Gomberg J; Bodin P
Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6812):570-4. PubMed ID: 11117741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Earthquake nucleation by transient deformations caused by the M = 7.9 Denali, Alaska, earthquake.
Gomberg J; Bodin P; Larson K; Dragert H
Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6975):621-4. PubMed ID: 14961117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Production-induced seismicity indicates a low risk of strong earthquakes in the Groningen gas field.
Boitz N; Langenbruch C; Shapiro SA
Nat Commun; 2024 Jan; 15(1):329. PubMed ID: 38184655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cascading elastic perturbation in Japan due to the 2012 M w 8.6 Indian Ocean earthquake.
Delorey AA; Chao K; Obara K; Johnson PA
Sci Adv; 2015 Oct; 1(9):e1500468. PubMed ID: 26601289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
