These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28326699)
1. [Influence of surface roughness on oral streptococcal adhesion forces to dental filling materials]. Sainan Z; Li J; Lei Z; Liying H; Lu Y; Wei L Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 34(5):448-453. PubMed ID: 28326699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins. Mei L; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Ren Y Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of enamel morphology on nanoscale adhesion forces of streptococcal bacteria : An AFM study. Wang C; Zhao Y; Zheng S; Xue J; Zhou J; Tang Y; Jiang L; Li W Scanning; 2015; 37(5):313-21. PubMed ID: 26482011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of in vitro Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces naeslundii attachment and growth on restorative materials surfaces. Wei CX; Leung WK; Burrow MF Aust Dent J; 2019 Dec; 64(4):365-375. PubMed ID: 31442307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microbial changes in biofilms on composite resins with different surface roughness: An in vitro study with a multispecies biofilm model. Park JW; An JS; Lim WH; Lim BS; Ahn SJ J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):493.e1-493.e8. PubMed ID: 31648793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oral bacterial adhesion forces to biomaterial surfaces constituting the bracket-adhesive-enamel junction in orthodontic treatment. Mei L; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Chen Y; de Vries J; Ren Y Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Aug; 117(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 19627354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface. Nedeljkovic I; De Munck J; Ungureanu AA; Slomka V; Bartic C; Vananroye A; Clasen C; Teughels W; Van Meerbeek B; Van Landuyt KL J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():36-43. PubMed ID: 28554609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Poisson analysis of streptococcal bond-strengthening on saliva-coated enamel. Mei L; Ren Y; Busscher HJ; Chen Y; van der Mei HC J Dent Res; 2009 Sep; 88(9):841-5. PubMed ID: 19767582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of light-curing time on fluoride release, surface topography, and bacterial adhesion in resin-modified glass ionomer cements: AFM and SEM in vitro study. Olmos-Olmos G; Teutle-Coyotecatl B; Román-Mendez CD; Carrasco-Gutiérrez R; González-Torres M; Contreras-Bulnes R; Rodríguez-Vilchis LE; de Los Angeles Moyaho-Bernal M Microsc Res Tech; 2021 Aug; 84(8):1628-1637. PubMed ID: 33580609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of surface characteristic of different restorative materials containing glass ionomer on Kelten OS; Hepdeniz OK; Tuncer Y; Kankaya DA; Gurdal O Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Jul; 23(7):957-964. PubMed ID: 32620725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does dental material type influence bacterial adhesion under the same polishing conditions? Direct observation using a fluorescent staining technique: An in vitro study. Tonprasong W; Inokoshi M; Tamura M; Yoshihara K; Takahashi R; Nozaki K; Wada T; Minakuchi S Dent Mater J; 2024 Jul; 43(4):485-494. PubMed ID: 38825451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of two prophylaxis methods on adherence of Streptococcus mutans to microfilled composite resin and giomer surfaces. Kimyai S; Lotfipour F; Pourabbas R; Sadr A; Nikazar S; Milani M Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2011 Jul; 16(4):e561-7. PubMed ID: 20711117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of bacterial adhesion to dental materials of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) using atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Fang J; Wang C; Li Y; Zhao Z; Mei L Scanning; 2016 Nov; 38(6):665-670. PubMed ID: 26991988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion. Aykent F; Yondem I; Ozyesil AG; Gunal SK; Avunduk MC; Ozkan S J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface characteristics of orthodontic adhesives and effects on streptococcal adhesion. Ahn SJ; Lim BS; Lee SJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):489-95; discussion 13A. PubMed ID: 20362908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material. Buergers R; Rosentritt M; Handel G J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):461-9. PubMed ID: 18061740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Vital Tooth Bleaching on Surface Roughness and Streptococcal Biofilm Formation on Direct Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials. Wongpraparatana I; Matangkasombut O; Thanyasrisung P; Panich M Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):51-59. PubMed ID: 28976842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus biofilm formation and metabolic activity on dental materials. Hahnel S; Mühlbauer G; Hoffmann J; Ionescu A; Bürgers R; Rosentritt M; Handel G; Häberlein I Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Mar; 70(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 21780966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Emergent Properties in Streptococcus mutans Biofilms Are Controlled through Adhesion Force Sensing by Initial Colonizers. Wang C; Hou J; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ; Ren Y mBio; 2019 Sep; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 31506311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]