929 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28327114)
1. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does surgical technique influence clinical outcome after lumbar spinal stenosis decompression? A comparative effectiveness study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
Hermansen E; Romild UK; Austevoll IM; Solberg T; Storheim K; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):420-427. PubMed ID: 27262561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 3 Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Rekeland F; Brox JI; Franssen E; Weber C; Solberg TK; Furunes H; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e224291. PubMed ID: 35344046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparable increases in dural sac area after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: radiological results from a randomized controlled trial in the NORDSTEN study.
Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Rekeland F; Brox JI; Franssen E; Weber C; Solberg T; Haug KJ; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K
Eur Spine J; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2254-2261. PubMed ID: 32556585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumental fusion the NORDSTEN degenerative spondylolisthesis trial (NORDSTEN-DS); study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Austevoll IM; Hermansen E; Fagerland M; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Brox JI; Lønne G; Indrekvam K; Aaen J; Grundnes O; Hellum C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 30611229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
Kelleher MO; Timlin M; Persaud O; Rampersaud YR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do patients with lumbar spinal stenosis benefit from decompression of levels with adjacent moderate stenosis? A prospective cohort study from the NORDSTEN study.
Tronstad S; Haug KJ; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Brisby H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Brox JI; Grundnes O; Franssen E; Indrekvam K; Solberg T; Hermansen E
Spine J; 2024 Jun; 24(6):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 38266826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
Thomé C; Zevgaridis D; Leheta O; Bäzner H; Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wöhrle J; Schmiedek P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the presence of foraminal stenosis associated with outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with posterior microsurgical decompression.
Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Anvar M; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Aug; 165(8):2121-2129. PubMed ID: 37407851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Overdevest G; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Jacobs W; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2244-63. PubMed ID: 26184719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.
Chang HS; Fujisawa N; Tsuchiya T; Oya S; Matsui T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 24365897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression.
Soliman HM
Spine J; 2015 Oct; 15(10):2282-9. PubMed ID: 26165475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis.
Hong SW; Choi KY; Ahn Y; Baek OK; Wang JC; Lee SH; Lee HY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(3):E172-8. PubMed ID: 21192307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
