197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28327199)
1. Measuring research impact in Australia's medical research institutes: a scoping literature review of the objectives for and an assessment of the capabilities of research impact assessment frameworks.
Deeming S; Searles A; Reeves P; Nilsson M
Health Res Policy Syst; 2017 Mar; 15(1):22. PubMed ID: 28327199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring research impact in medical research institutes: a qualitative study of the attitudes and opinions of Australian medical research institutes towards research impact assessment frameworks.
Deeming S; Reeves P; Ramanathan S; Attia J; Nilsson M; Searles A
Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Mar; 16(1):28. PubMed ID: 29548331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery.
Ramanathan S; Reeves P; Deeming S; Bernhardt J; Nilsson M; Cadilhac DA; Walker FR; Carey L; Middleton S; Lynch E; Searles A
Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Aug; 16(1):71. PubMed ID: 30068358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Challenges to pharmaceutical policymaking: lessons from Australia's national medicines policy.
Lipworth W; Doran E; Kerridge I; Day R
Aust Health Rev; 2014 May; 38(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 24589424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prioritising and incentivising productivity within indicator-based approaches to Research Impact Assessment: a commentary.
Deeming S; Hure A; Attia J; Nilsson M; Searles A
Health Res Policy Syst; 2023 Dec; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 38110938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact.
Searles A; Doran C; Attia J; Knight D; Wiggers J; Deeming S; Mattes J; Webb B; Hannan S; Ling R; Edmunds K; Reeves P; Nilsson M
Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Aug; 14(1):60. PubMed ID: 27507300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the health impact of transnational corporations: a case study on McDonald's Australia.
Anaf J; Baum FE; Fisher M; Harris E; Friel S
Global Health; 2017 Feb; 13(1):7. PubMed ID: 28166801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a framework to improve the utilisation of malaria research for policy development in Malawi.
Mwendera C; de Jager C; Longwe H; Hongoro C; Phiri K; Mutero CM
Health Res Policy Syst; 2017 Nov; 15(1):97. PubMed ID: 29157288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Directing research funds to the right research projects: a review of criteria used by research organisations in Australia in prioritising health research projects for funding.
Tuffaha HW; El Saifi N; Chambers SK; Scuffham PA
BMJ Open; 2018 Dec; 8(12):e026207. PubMed ID: 30580278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The characteristics and reporting quality of research impact case studies: A systematic review.
Heyeres M; Tsey K; Yang Y; Yan L; Jiang H
Eval Program Plann; 2019 Apr; 73():10-23. PubMed ID: 30453183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of the translation and impact from a childhood obesity trial programme: rationale and protocol for a research impact assessment.
Reeves P; Deeming S; Ramanathan S; Wiggers J; Wolfenden L; Searles A
Health Res Policy Syst; 2017 Dec; 15(1):111. PubMed ID: 29258512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conducting clinical trials-costs, impacts, and the value of clinical trials networks: A scoping review.
Bentley C; Cressman S; van der Hoek K; Arts K; Dancey J; Peacock S
Clin Trials; 2019 Apr; 16(2):183-193. PubMed ID: 30628466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the impact of National Breast Cancer Foundation-funded research.
Donovan C; Butler L; Butt AJ; Jones TH; Hanney SR
Med J Aust; 2014 Mar; 200(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 24580524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Narrative review of frameworks for translating research evidence into policy and practice.
Milat AJ; Li B
Public Health Res Pract; 2017 Feb; 27(1):. PubMed ID: 28243670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Governance of health research funding institutions: an integrated conceptual framework and actionable functions of governance.
Smits P; Champagne F
Health Res Policy Syst; 2020 Feb; 18(1):22. PubMed ID: 32070372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact structured patient assessment frameworks have on patient care: an integrative review.
Munroe B; Curtis K; Considine J; Buckley T
J Clin Nurs; 2013 Nov; 22(21-22):2991-3005. PubMed ID: 23656285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
