197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28327199)
21. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. DEVELOPMENTS IN VALUE FRAMEWORKS TO INFORM THE ALLOCATION OF HEALTHCARE RESOURCES.
Oortwijn W; Sampietro-Colom L; Habens F
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(2):323-329. PubMed ID: 28578735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. How to Assess Quality of Research in Iran, From Input to Impact? Introduction of Peer-Based Research Evaluation Model in Iran.
Ebadifar A; Baradaran Eftekhari M; Owlia P; Habibi E; Ghalenoee E; Bagheri MR; Falahat K; Eltemasi M; Sobhani Z; Akhondzadeh S
Arch Iran Med; 2017 Nov; 20(11):680-685. PubMed ID: 29480732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Priority setting and policy advocacy by nursing associations: a scoping review and implications using a socio-ecological whole systems lens.
MacDonald JA; Edwards N; Davies B; Marck P; Guernsey JR
Health Policy; 2012 Sep; 107(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 22522006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A mixed methods study of the factors that influence whether intervention research has policy and practice impacts: perceptions of Australian researchers.
Newson R; King L; Rychetnik L; Bauman AE; Redman S; Milat AJ; Schroeder J; Cohen G; Chapman S
BMJ Open; 2015 Jul; 5(7):e008153. PubMed ID: 26198428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Attaching unit costs to Australia's National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing.
Mihalopoulos C; Meadows G; Stiller A; Pirkis J; Burgess P
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2005 Jun; 8(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 15998978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can we decide which outcomes should be measured in every clinical trial? A scoping review of the existing conceptual frameworks and processes to develop core outcome sets.
Idzerda L; Rader T; Tugwell P; Boers M
J Rheumatol; 2014 May; 41(5):986-93. PubMed ID: 24584917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A model for Southern Mediterranean research institute self-assessment: a SWOT analysis-based approach to promote capacity building at Theodor Bilharz Research Institute in Cairo (Egypt).
Ghinolfi D; El Baz HG; Borgonovi E; Radwan A; Laurence O; Sayed HA; De Simone P; Abdelwadoud M; Stefani A; Botros SS; Filipponi F
Arab J Gastroenterol; 2014; 15(3-4):92-7. PubMed ID: 25241620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Educational and health impact of the Baume Report: 'A Cutting Edge: Australia's Surgical Workforce'.
Hillis DJ; Gorton MW; Barraclough BH; Beckett D
Aust Health Rev; 2014 Nov; 38(5):487-94. PubMed ID: 25283509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The contribution of conceptual frameworks to knowledge translation interventions in physical therapy.
Hudon A; Gervais MJ; Hunt M
Phys Ther; 2015 Apr; 95(4):630-9. PubMed ID: 25060959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Mobile Health Technologies for Managing Chronic Conditions in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.
Matthew-Maich N; Harris L; Ploeg J; Markle-Reid M; Valaitis R; Ibrahim S; Gafni A; Isaacs S
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jun; 4(2):e29. PubMed ID: 27282195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Outcomes of adoption: measuring evidence uptake by individuals and organizations.
Donaldson NE; Rutledge DN; Ashley J
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2004; 1 Suppl 1():S41-51. PubMed ID: 17129334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of including regional anaesthesia in enhanced recovery protocols: a scoping review.
McIsaac DI; Cole ET; McCartney CJ
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Dec; 115 Suppl 2():ii46-56. PubMed ID: 26658201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Scoping review identifies significant number of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks with limited use.
Strifler L; Cardoso R; McGowan J; Cogo E; Nincic V; Khan PA; Scott A; Ghassemi M; MacDonald H; Lai Y; Treister V; Tricco AC; Straus SE
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 100():92-102. PubMed ID: 29660481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Looking both ways: a review of methods for assessing research impacts on policy and the policy utilisation of research.
Newson R; King L; Rychetnik L; Milat A; Bauman A
Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Jun; 16(1):54. PubMed ID: 29940961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Health Professional Digital Capabilities Frameworks: A Scoping Review.
Brice S; Almond H
J Multidiscip Healthc; 2020; 13():1375-1390. PubMed ID: 33173300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Knowledge translation in healthcare: Incorporating theories of learning and knowledge from the management literature.
Oborn E; Barrett M; Racko G
J Health Organ Manag; 2013; 27(4):412-31. PubMed ID: 24003630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.
Fischer F; Lewith G; Witt CM; Linde K; von Ammon K; Cardini F; Falkenberg T; Fønnebø V; Johannessen H; Reiter B; Uehleke B; Weidenhammer W; Brinkhaus B
Forsch Komplementmed; 2014; 21(2):e1-16. PubMed ID: 24851850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Critical examination of knowledge to action models and implications for promoting health equity.
Davison CM; Ndumbe-Eyoh S; Clement C
Int J Equity Health; 2015 May; 14():49. PubMed ID: 26022369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
