These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28327231)
1. Attractiveness biases are the tip of the iceberg in biological markets. Barclay P Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e21. PubMed ID: 28327231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strong but flexible: How fundamental social motives support but sometimes also thwart favorable attractiveness biases. Agthe M; Maner JK Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e20. PubMed ID: 28327230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology. Maestripieri D; Henry A; Nickels N Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e19. PubMed ID: 27283466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is there an alternative explanation to the evolutionary account for financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive individuals? Dang J Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e25. PubMed ID: 28327235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Explanations for attractiveness-related positive biases in an evolutionary perspective of life history theory. Chen BB Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e24. PubMed ID: 28327229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What does evolutionary theory add to stereotype theory in the explanation of attractiveness bias? Maguire KQ; Racine TP Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e35. PubMed ID: 28327243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How should we tackle financial and prosocial biases against unattractive people? Minerva F Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e36. PubMed ID: 28327244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The biasing effects of appearances go beyond physical attractiveness and mating motives. Olivola CY; Todorov A Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e38. PubMed ID: 28327247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. There is more: Intrasexual competitiveness, physical dominance, and intrasexual collaboration. Buunk AP Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e23. PubMed ID: 28327233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prosocial behavior as sexual signaling. Roberts G Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e41. PubMed ID: 28327252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attention and memory benefits for physical attractiveness may mediate prosocial biases. Becker DV Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e22. PubMed ID: 28327232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Omitted evidence undermines sexual motives explanation for attractiveness bias. LaFrance M; Eagly AH Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e31. PubMed ID: 28327236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Context matters for attractiveness bias. Lee J; Adams G; Li YJ; Gillath O Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e33. PubMed ID: 28327241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tinbergen's "four questions" provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people. Stephen ID; Burke D; Sulikowski D Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e44. PubMed ID: 28327249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding the physical attractiveness literature: Qualitative reviews versus meta-analysis. Feingold A Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e28. PubMed ID: 28327238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]