These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28327233)

  • 1. There is more: Intrasexual competitiveness, physical dominance, and intrasexual collaboration.
    Buunk AP
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e23. PubMed ID: 28327233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness.
    Fisher ML
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Aug; 271 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S283-5. PubMed ID: 15503995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrasexual Competition and Height in Adolescents and Adults.
    Polo P; Fernandez A; Muñoz-Reyes JA; Dufey M; Buunk AP
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704917749172. PubMed ID: 29361847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Jealousy at work: The role of rivals' characteristics.
    Zurriaga R; González-Navarro P; Buunk AP; Dijkstra P
    Scand J Psychol; 2018 Aug; 59(4):443-450. PubMed ID: 29582443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A longitudinal analysis of women's salivary testosterone and intrasexual competitiveness.
    Hahn AC; Fisher CI; Cobey KD; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2016 Feb; 64():117-22. PubMed ID: 26655829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parental social status and intrasexual competitiveness among adolescents.
    Buunk AP; Stulp G; Ormel J
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Nov; 12(5):1022-37. PubMed ID: 25403184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strong but flexible: How fundamental social motives support but sometimes also thwart favorable attractiveness biases.
    Agthe M; Maner JK
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e20. PubMed ID: 28327230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intolerance of sexy peers: intrasexual competition among women.
    Vaillancourt T; Sharma A
    Aggress Behav; 2011; 37(6):569-77. PubMed ID: 21932332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology.
    Maestripieri D; Henry A; Nickels N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e19. PubMed ID: 27283466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Women ornament themselves for intrasexual competition near ovulation, but for intersexual attraction in luteal phase.
    Zhuang JY; Wang JX
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106407. PubMed ID: 25180577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring female intrasexual competition by the scale for intrasexual competition: a validation of the German version.
    Fiacco S; Palm-Fischbacher S; Campbell J; Ehlert U
    Arch Womens Ment Health; 2019 Apr; 22(2):259-266. PubMed ID: 30046878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attractiveness bias: A cognitive explanation.
    Schein SS; Trujillo LT; Langlois JH
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e43. PubMed ID: 28327248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Body-esteem of pupils who attended single-sex versus mixed-sex schools: a cross-sectional study of intrasexual competition and peer victimization.
    Lereya ST; Eryigit-Madzwamuse S; Patra C; Smith JH; Wolke D
    J Adolesc; 2014 Oct; 37(7):1109-19. PubMed ID: 25150892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The rival wears Prada: luxury consumption as a female competition strategy.
    Hudders L; De Backer C; Fisher M; Vyncke P
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Jun; 12(3):570-87. PubMed ID: 25299993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals.
    Stockley P; Bro-Jørgensen J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 May; 86(2):341-66. PubMed ID: 20636474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there an alternative explanation to the evolutionary account for financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive individuals?
    Dang J
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e25. PubMed ID: 28327235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Female competition and aggression: interdisciplinary perspectives.
    Stockley P; Campbell A
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2013; 368(1631):20130073. PubMed ID: 24167303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competition-related factors directly influence preferences for facial cues of dominance in allies.
    Watkins CD; Jones BC
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2016; 70(12):2071-2079. PubMed ID: 27881894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evolution of human intrasexual competition: tactics of mate attraction.
    Buss DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1988 Apr; 54(4):616-28. PubMed ID: 3367282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attractiveness biases are the tip of the iceberg in biological markets.
    Barclay P
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e21. PubMed ID: 28327231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.