204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28327473)
1. Simulation study of a D-shape PET scanner for improved sensitivity and reduced cost in whole-body imaging.
Ahmed AM; Tashima H; Yamaya T
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(10):4107-4117. PubMed ID: 28327473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simulation study comparing the helmet-chin PET with a cylindrical PET of the same number of detectors.
Ahmed AM; Tashima H; Yoshida E; Nishikido F; Yamaya T
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(11):4541-4550. PubMed ID: 28489608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo simulation of sensitivity and NECR of an entire-body PET scanner.
Isnaini I; Obi T; Yoshida E; Yamaya T
Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jul; 7(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 24366757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance evaluation of a high-resolution brain PET scanner using four-layer MPPC DOI detectors.
Watanabe M; Saito A; Isobe T; Ote K; Yamada R; Moriya T; Omura T
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):7148-7166. PubMed ID: 28753133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of system geometry and other physical factors on photon sensitivity of high-resolution positron emission tomography.
Habte F; Foudray AM; Olcott PD; Levin CS
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3753-72. PubMed ID: 17664575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accurate Monte Carlo modeling and performance assessment of the X-PET subsystem of the FLEX triumph preclinical PET/CT scanner.
Zeraatkar N; Ay MR; Kamali-Asl AR; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1217-25. PubMed ID: 21520834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of detector design on imaging performance of a long axial field-of-view, whole-body PET scanner.
Surti S; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(13):5343-58. PubMed ID: 26108352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of spatial resolution improvement by use of a mouth-insert detector in the helmet PET scanner.
Ahmed AM; Tashima H; Yamaya T
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Mar; 11(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 28986818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A second-generation virtual-pinhole PET device for enhancing contrast recovery and improving lesion detectability of a whole-body PET/CT scanner.
Jiang J; Li K; Wang Q; Puterbaugh K; Young JW; Siegel SB; O'Sullivan JA; Tai YC
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):4165-4176. PubMed ID: 31315157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation study of spatial resolution and sensitivity for the tapered depth of interaction PET detectors for small animal imaging.
St James S; Yang Y; Bowen SL; Qi J; Cherry SR
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(2):N63-74. PubMed ID: 20023331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative image reconstruction for total-body PET imaging using the 2-meter long EXPLORER scanner.
Zhang X; Zhou J; Cherry SR; Badawi RD; Qi J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2465-2485. PubMed ID: 28240215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental characterization and system simulations of depth of interaction PET detectors using 0.5 mm and 0.7 mm LSO arrays.
James SS; Yang Y; Wu Y; Farrell R; Dokhale P; Shah KS; Cherry SR
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4605-19. PubMed ID: 19567945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulation study to improve the performance of a whole-body PbF
Consuegra D; Korpar S; Križan P; Pestotnik R; Razdevšek G; Dolenec R
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(5):055013. PubMed ID: 31978910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Time-of-Flight PET/CT with a Large Axial Field of View for Reducing Whole-Body Acquisition Time.
Akamatsu G; Uba K; Taniguchi T; Mitsumoto K; Narisue A; Tsutsui Y; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2014 Jun; 42(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 24799607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility study of a point-of-care positron emission tomography system with interactive imaging capability.
Jiang J; Li K; Komarov S; O'Sullivan JA; Tai YC
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 30667069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo simulations of the count rate performance of a clinical whole-body MR/PET scanner.
Delso G; Martinez MJ; Torres I; Ladebeck R; Michel C; Nekolla S; Ziegler SI
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):4126-35. PubMed ID: 19810486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional positron emission tomography imaging with 124I and 86Y.
Vandenberghe S
Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Mar; 27(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 16479243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Prototype High-Resolution Small-Animal PET Scanner Dedicated to Mouse Brain Imaging.
Yang Y; Bec J; Zhou J; Zhang M; Judenhofer MS; Bai X; Di K; Wu Y; Rodriguez M; Dokhale P; Shah KS; Farrell R; Qi J; Cherry SR
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1130-5. PubMed ID: 27013696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Active-PET: a multifunctional PET scanner with dynamic gantry size featuring high-resolution and high-sensitivity imaging: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
Sanaat A; Jamalizadeh M; Khanmohammadi H; Arabi H; Zaidi H
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jul; 67(15):. PubMed ID: 35803249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physical performance of a long axial field-of-view PET scanner prototype with sparse rings configuration: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Zein SA; Karakatsanis NA; Issa M; Haj-Ali AA; Nehmeh SA
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1949-1957. PubMed ID: 31985827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
