These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28328251)

  • 1. Predicting Presidential Election Outcomes from What People Watch.
    Barfar A; Padmanabhan B
    Big Data; 2017 Mar; 5(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 28328251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does Television Viewership Predict Presidential Election Outcomes?
    Barfar A; Padmanabhan B
    Big Data; 2015 Sep; 3(3):138-147. PubMed ID: 26487986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Demographic change and the 2016 presidential election.
    Maggio C
    Soc Sci Res; 2021 Mar; 95():102459. PubMed ID: 33653583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Public interest in Cannabis during election season: a Google Trends analysis.
    Torgerson T; Roberts W; Lester D; Khojasteh J; Vassar M
    J Cannabis Res; 2020 Sep; 2(1):31. PubMed ID: 33526135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 280 characters to the White House: predicting 2020 U.S. presidential elections from twitter data.
    Rizk R; Rizk D; Rizk F; Hsu S
    Comput Math Organ Theory; 2023 Mar; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 37360912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.
    Klimek P; Aykaç A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293239. PubMed ID: 37967045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driving fatalities on US presidential election days: a reanalysis.
    Zhang F; Aronow PM
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jul; 9():341. PubMed ID: 27411714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simple method for predicting American presidential greatness from victory margin in popular vote (1824-1996).
    McCann SJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2005 Jun; 145(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 15960001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physical Inactivity and Obesity in the United States Through the Lens of the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Elections.
    Arena R; Pronk NP; Woodard C
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 49(1 Pt B):102068. PubMed ID: 37689376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elections have (health) consequences: Depression, anxiety, and the 2020 presidential election.
    Mukhopadhyay S
    Econ Hum Biol; 2022 Dec; 47():101191. PubMed ID: 36257104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving Predictive Accuracy in Elections.
    Sathiaraj D; Cassidy WM; Rohli E
    Big Data; 2017 Dec; 5(4):325-336. PubMed ID: 29235914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving election prediction internationally.
    Kennedy R; Wojcik S; Lazer D
    Science; 2017 Feb; 355(6324):515-520. PubMed ID: 28154078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Facebook data to predict the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Chang KC; Chiang CF; Lin MJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0253560. PubMed ID: 34851951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Happy warriors" revisited: hedonic and agonic display repertoires of presidential candidates on the evening news.
    Bucy EP; Grabe ME
    Politics Life Sci; 2008 Mar; 27(1):78-98. PubMed ID: 19213305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual priming and framing of the 2016 GOP and Democratic Party presidential primary debates.
    Stewart PA; Eubanks AD; Miller J
    Politics Life Sci; 2019 May; 38(1):14-31. PubMed ID: 31094672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicted and experienced affective responses to the outcome of the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
    Kitchens MB; Corser GC; Gohm CL; VonWaldner KL; Foreman EL
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Dec; 107(3):837-46. PubMed ID: 21323142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methodology with bootstrap percentile estimates for predicting presidential election results in Ghana.
    Nortey EN; Ansah-Narh T; Asah-Asante R; Minkah R
    Springerplus; 2015; 4():525. PubMed ID: 26435890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using "Big Data" Versus Alternative Measures of Aggregate Data to Predict the U.S. 2016 Presidential Election.
    Ma-Kellams C; Bishop B; Zhang MF; Villagrana B
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Aug; 121(4):726-735. PubMed ID: 29298630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors associated with post-election psychological distress: The case of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Pitcho-Prelorentzos S; Kaniasty K; Hamama-Raz Y; Goodwin R; Ring L; Ben-Ezra M; Mahat-Shamir M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Aug; 266():1-4. PubMed ID: 29787806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.