These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28328887)
21. 'Doubling up' procedures in a protocol amendment. Flawed reasoning. Correa-Murphy R Lab Anim (NY); 2011 Jun; 40(7):210-1. PubMed ID: 21691292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. 'Doubling up' procedures in a protocol amendment. Too many problems. Boehm C; Jackson T Lab Anim (NY); 2011 Jun; 40(7):210. PubMed ID: 21691293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. 'Doubling up' procedures in a protocol amendment. One size does not fit all. Hallman T; Panchella L Lab Anim (NY); 2011 Jun; 40(7):209-10. PubMed ID: 21691291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Introduction to the 3Rs (refinement, reduction and replacement). Guhad F Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci; 2005 Mar; 44(2):58-9. PubMed ID: 15812977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Decerebrate mammalian preparations: unalleviated or fully alleviated pain? A review and opinion. Silverman J; Garnett NL; Giszter SF; Heckman CJ; Kulpa-Eddy JA; Lemay MA; Perry CK; Pinter M Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci; 2005 Jul; 44(4):34-6. PubMed ID: 16050666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Delay between adaptation and experimentation. Lab Anim (NY); 2013 Feb; 42(2):49. PubMed ID: 23340784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Response to Protocol Review Scenario: pilot study. Levin SI; Zielinski Mozny NA Lab Anim (NY); 2013 Feb; 42(2):49-50. PubMed ID: 23340783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Response to Protocol Review Scenario: is the change significant? Horne WI; Riccio DC Lab Anim (NY); 2013 Feb; 42(2):50. PubMed ID: 23340786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International fails to meaningfully address concerns regarding its accreditation program. Goodman JR J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2015; 18(3):314-5. PubMed ID: 26055320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Response to Protocol Review Scenario: IACUC observation team. Richerson JT Lab Anim (NY); 2013 Feb; 42(2):50-1. PubMed ID: 23340785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. All the information on animal lab accreditation. Lab Anim (NY); 2014 Jan; 43(1):16. PubMed ID: 24356016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A review of USDA's rule on contingency plans. Cardon AD; Bailey MR; Bennett BT Lab Anim (NY); 2013 Oct; 42(10):353. PubMed ID: 24051633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Postop monitoring: on the record? Lab Anim (NY); 2005 Nov; 34(10):15. PubMed ID: 16261145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Challenges of conducting animal based research and teaching in medical colleges of Karachi, Pakistan. Khan MU; Amin F; Arain FM J Pak Med Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):487. PubMed ID: 28304011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Postop monitoring: on the record? Compromise is in order. Kurtz DM Lab Anim (NY); 2005 Nov; 34(10):15-6. PubMed ID: 16261144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Postop monitoring: on the record? Proof is in the records. Levin SI; Berger DM Lab Anim (NY); 2005 Nov; 34(10):16-7. PubMed ID: 16261146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Postop monitoring: on the record? Consider analgesia for all. Keys MJ Lab Anim (NY); 2005 Nov; 34(10):16. PubMed ID: 16261147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]