These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28328928)

  • 1. Fraudulent ID using face morphs: Experiments on human and automatic recognition.
    Robertson DJ; Kramer RS; Burton AM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173319. PubMed ID: 28328928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Redesigning photo-ID to improve unfamiliar face matching performance.
    White D; Burton AM; Jenkins R; Kemp RI
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 24749864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Viewers base estimates of face matching accuracy on their own familiarity: Explaining the photo-ID paradox.
    Ritchie KL; Smith FG; Jenkins R; Bindemann M; White D; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():161-9. PubMed ID: 25988915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting morphed passport photos: a training and individual differences approach.
    Robertson DJ; Mungall A; Watson DG; Wade KA; Nightingale SJ; Butler S
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2018 Dec; 3():27. PubMed ID: 30046650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances.
    Andrews S; Jenkins R; Cursiter H; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):2041-50. PubMed ID: 25607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Face morphing attacks: Investigating detection with humans and computers.
    Kramer RSS; Mireku MO; Flack TR; Ritchie KL
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Jul; 4(1):28. PubMed ID: 31359213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Face learning and the emergence of view-independent face recognition: an event-related brain potential study.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1320-9. PubMed ID: 23583970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
    Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identity-level representations affect unfamiliar face matching performance in sequential but not simultaneous tasks.
    Menon N; White D; Kemp RI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1777-93. PubMed ID: 25686094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Viewers extract the mean from images of the same person: A route to face learning.
    Kramer RS; Ritchie KL; Burton AM
    J Vis; 2015; 15(4):1. PubMed ID: 26067175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic identification of familiar faces.
    Jung K; Ruthruff E; Gaspelin N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1438-50. PubMed ID: 23749679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Passport officers' errors in face matching.
    White D; Kemp RI; Jenkins R; Matheson M; Burton AM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e103510. PubMed ID: 25133682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Face averages enhance user recognition for smartphone security.
    Robertson DJ; Kramer RS; Burton AM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119460. PubMed ID: 25807251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition.
    Robbins RA; Coltheart M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1098-104. PubMed ID: 22642217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interactive processes in matching identity and expressions of unfamiliar faces: evidence for mutual facilitation effects.
    Levy Y; Bentin S
    Perception; 2008; 37(6):915-30. PubMed ID: 18686710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dominance of texture over shape in facial identity processing is modulated by individual abilities.
    Itz ML; Golle J; Luttmann S; Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM
    Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):369-396. PubMed ID: 27230305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face learning with multiple images leads to fast acquisition of familiarity for specific individuals.
    Dowsett AJ; Sandford A; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 25671778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.