These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28328995)
1. Effectiveness of interceptive treatment of class III malocclusions with skeletal anchorage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rodríguez de Guzmán-Barrera J; Sáez Martínez C; Boronat-Catalá M; Montiel-Company JM; Paredes-Gallardo V; Gandía-Franco JL; Almerich-Silla JM; Bellot-Arcís C PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173875. PubMed ID: 28328995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical outcome of skeletal anchorage in interceptive treatment (in growing patients) for class III malocclusion. Meyns J; Brasil DM; Mazzi-Chaves JF; Politis C; Jacobs R Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1003-1010. PubMed ID: 29709324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary protraction at early ages. The revolution of new bone anchorage appliances. Solano-Mendoza B; Iglesias-Linares A; Yañez-Vico RM; Mendoza-Mendoza A; Alió-Sanz JJ; Solano-Reina E J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 37(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 23534334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient. Cha BK; Choi DS; Ngan P; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Kim SM; Jang IS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 21195283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects produced by the facemask with and without skeletal anchorage for the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Rutili V; Nieri M; Franceschi D; Pierleoni F; Giuntini V; Franchi L Eur J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 45(2):157-168. PubMed ID: 36074492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Timely management of developing class III malocclusion. Yelampalli MR; Rachala MR J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 22565523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage. Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone-anchored maxillary protraction to correct a class III skeletal relationship: A multicenter retrospective analysis of 218 patients. Van Hevele J; Nout E; Claeys T; Meyns J; Scheerlinck J; Politis C J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 46(10):1800-1806. PubMed ID: 30082169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methodological quality and outcome of systematic reviews reporting on orthopaedic treatment for class III malocclusion: Overview of systematic reviews. Jamilian A; Cannavale R; Piancino MG; Eslami S; Perillo L J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 43(2):102-20. PubMed ID: 27086590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia. Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. One-phase vs 2-phase treatment for developing Class III malocclusion: a comparison of identical twins. Sugawara J; Aymach Z; Hin H; Nanda R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jan; 141(1):e11-22. PubMed ID: 22196197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Miniplates and screws in treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with missing posterior teeth. A case report. Rattanayatikul C; Godfrey K; Chawengchettanon J; Vattraraphoudet T Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 17203582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of class II malocclusion treatment using bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage: a systematic review. Alhammadi MS; Qasem AAA; Yamani AMS; Duhduh RDA; Alshahrani RT; Halboub E; Almashraqi AA BMC Oral Health; 2022 Aug; 22(1):339. PubMed ID: 35948959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Closure of severe skeletal anterior open bite with zygomatic anchorage. Seres L; Kocsis A J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 19276813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cephalometric variables used to predict the success of interceptive treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and face mask. A longitudinal study. Nardoni DN; Siqueira DF; Cardoso Mde A; Capelozza Filho L Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 25741830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel method for treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients. Al-Mozany SA; Dalci O; Almuzian M; Gonzalez C; Tarraf NE; Ali Darendeliler M Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):40. PubMed ID: 29226300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Early treatment of Class III malocclusion]. Le Gall M; Philip C; Salvadori A Orthod Fr; 2011 Sep; 82(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 21914432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Orthopedic treatment of Class III malocclusions using skeletal anchorage: A bibliographical review. Sahin T; Delforge A; Garreau E; Raoul G; Ferri J Int Orthod; 2016 Sep; 14(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 27496386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 3-year follow-up. Anne Mandall N; Cousley R; DiBiase A; Dyer F; Littlewood S; Mattick R; Nute S; Doherty B; Stivaros N; McDowall R; Shargill I; Ahmad A; Walsh T; Worthington H J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):176-85. PubMed ID: 22984102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]