These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis. Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term follow-up after aortic root replacement with the Shelhigh® biological valved conduit: a word of caution! Sahin A; Müggler O; Sromicki J; Caliskan E; Reser D; Emmert MY; Alkadhi H; Maisano F; Falk V; Holubec T Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Dec; 50(6):1172-1178. PubMed ID: 27229673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of long-term outcomes: aortic valve reimplantation versus aortic valve and root replacement with biological valved conduit in aortic root aneurysm with tricuspid valve. Yamabe T; Zhao Y; Kurlansky PA; Nitta S; Borger MA; George I; Smith CR; Takayama H Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 Apr; 59(3):658-665. PubMed ID: 33230518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Aortic root surgery in the United States: a report from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Stamou SC; Williams ML; Gunn TM; Hagberg RC; Lobdell KW; Kouchoukos NT J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 149(1):116-22.e4. PubMed ID: 24934089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of sinuses of Valsalva on prosthesis durability in patients undergoing ascending aorta and aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis: a propensity score-based study. Ius F; Koigeldiyev N; Roumieh M; Ismail I; Tudorache I; Shrestha M; Fleissner F; Haverich A; Cebotari S Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1676-84. PubMed ID: 26656448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Aortic root replacement using a biovalsalva prosthesis in comparison to a "handsewn" composite bioprosthesis. Moorjani N; Modi A; Mattam K; Barlow C; Tsang G; Haw M; Livesey S; Ohri S J Card Surg; 2010 May; 25(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 20202036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Favorable outcome after composite valve-graft replacement in patients older than 65 years. Ehrlich MP; Ergin MA; McCullough JN; Lansman SL; Galla JD; Bodian CA; Griepp RB Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 May; 71(5):1454-9. PubMed ID: 11383782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Are thromboembolic and bleeding complications a drawback for composite aortic root replacement? Zafar MA; Farkas EA; Javier A; Anderson M; Gilani O; Elefteriades JA Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 94(3):737-43. PubMed ID: 22626762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement: early experience with the De Paulis Valsalva graft in 51 patients. Patel ND; Williams JA; Barreiro CJ; Bethea BT; Fitton TP; Dietz HC; Lima JA; Spevak PJ; Gott VL; Vricella LA; Cameron DE Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Aug; 82(2):548-53. PubMed ID: 16863761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Surgery of the aortic root: should we go for the valve-sparing root reconstruction or the composite graft-valve replacement is still the first choice of treatment for these patients? Lamana Fde A; Dias RR; Duncan JA; Faria LB; Malbouisson LM; Borges Lde F; Mady C; Jatene FB Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc; 2015; 30(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 26313725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]