These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28329895)

  • 1. Using a State Birth Registry as a Quality Improvement Tool.
    Lannon C; Kaplan HC; Friar K; Fuller S; Ford S; White B; Besl J; Paulson J; Marcotte M; Krew M; Bailit J; Iams J
    Am J Perinatol; 2017 Aug; 34(10):958-965. PubMed ID: 28329895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Early Elective Deliveries and Improve Birth Registry Accuracy.
    Kaplan HC; King E; White BE; Ford SE; Fuller S; Krew MA; Marcotte MP; Iams JD; Bailit JL; Bouchard JM; Friar K; Lannon CM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 131(4):688-695. PubMed ID: 29528918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 36(0/7)-38(6/7) weeks' gestation.
    Donovan EF; Lannon C; Bailit J; Rose B; Iams JD; Byczkowski T;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 202(3):243.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20207241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rates of labor induction without medical indication are overestimated when derived from birth certificate data.
    Bailit JL;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):269.e1-3. PubMed ID: 20816150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in the indications for scheduled births to reduce nonmedically indicated deliveries occurring before 39 weeks of gestation.
    Bailit JL; Iams J; Silber A; Krew M; McKenna D; Marcotte M; Donovan E;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 120(2 Pt 1):241-5. PubMed ID: 22825080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Non-Medically Indicated Scheduled Deliveries.
    Kacica MA; Glantz JC; Xiong K; Shields EP; Cherouny PH
    Matern Child Health J; 2017 Apr; 21(4):932-941. PubMed ID: 27987105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and validation of a simple algorithm to estimate common gestational age categories using standard administrative birth record data in Ontario, Canada.
    Fitzpatrick T; Wilton AS; Guttmann A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Feb; 41(2):207-211. PubMed ID: 32590915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public Health Data in Action: An Analysis of Using Louisiana Vital Statistics for Quality Improvement and Payment Reform.
    Danilack VA; Gee RE; Berthelot DP; Gurvich R; Muri JH
    Matern Child Health J; 2017 May; 21(5):988-994. PubMed ID: 28316039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A medical birth registry at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre.
    Bergsjø P; Mlay J; Lie RT; Lie-Nielsen E; Shao JF
    East Afr J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 4(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17907753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study of underreporting of Down's syndrome on birth certificates in an Ohio County, 1970-78.
    Barg MS; Huether CA
    Public Health Rep; 1983; 98(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 6219419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new typology for understanding context: qualitative exploration of the model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ).
    Reed JE; Kaplan HC; Ismail SA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jul; 18(1):584. PubMed ID: 30045741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Medical birth registry--an essential resource in perinatal medical research].
    Irgens LM
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Oct; 122(26):2546-9. PubMed ID: 12522882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of a selection of pregnancy complications in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.
    Moth FN; Sebastian TR; Horn J; Rich-Edwards J; Romundstad PR; Åsvold BO
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 May; 95(5):519-27. PubMed ID: 26867143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One size fits none - a qualitative study investigating nine national quality registries' conditions for use in quality improvement, research and interaction with patients.
    Sparring V; Granström E; Andreen Sachs M; Brommels M; Nyström ME
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Oct; 18(1):802. PubMed ID: 30342511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi method approach to the assessment of data quality in the Finnish Medical Birth Registry.
    Teperi J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1993 Jun; 47(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 8350040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How well do birth records serve maternal and child health programs? Birth registration system evaluation, New York City, 2008-2011.
    Howland RE; Madsen AM; Toprani A; Gambatese M; Mulready-Ward C; Begier E
    Matern Child Health J; 2015 Jul; 19(7):1559-66. PubMed ID: 25604629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Notes on vital statistics for the study of perinatal health].
    Juárez SP
    Gac Sanit; 2014; 28(6):505-7. PubMed ID: 24878259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data accuracy in the Ontario birth Registry: a chart re-abstraction study.
    Dunn S; Lanes A; Sprague AE; Fell DB; Weiss D; Reszel J; Taljaard M; Darling EK; Graham ID; Grimshaw JM; Harrold J; Smith GN; Peterson W; Walker M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Dec; 19(1):1001. PubMed ID: 31881960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data quality of a computerized medical birth registry.
    Lu JH; Lin FM; Shen WY; Chen SJ; Hwang BT; Wu SI; Yu YM
    Med Inform (Lond); 1994; 19(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 7603123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing accuracy of birth certificate data through a statewide quality improvement initiative in Illinois.
    Lee King PA; Finnegan K; Schneider P; Oh EH; Lee S; Bennett A; Borders A
    J Perinatol; 2023 Nov; 43(11):1440-1445. PubMed ID: 37783851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.