262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28331163)
1. In vitro evaluation of candidate Bacillus spp. for animal feed.
Mingmongkolchai S; Panbangred W
J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2017 May; 63(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 28331163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cellulolytic potential of probiotic Bacillus Subtilis AMS6 isolated from traditional fermented soybean (Churpi): An in-vitro study with regards to application as an animal feed additive.
Manhar AK; Bashir Y; Saikia D; Nath D; Gupta K; Konwar BK; Kumar R; Namsa ND; Mandal M
Microbiol Res; 2016; 186-187():62-70. PubMed ID: 27242144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Isolation and characterization of Bacillus subtilis CH16 strain from chicken gastrointestinal tracts for use as a feed supplement to promote weight gain in broilers.
Nguyen AT; Nguyen DV; Tran MT; Nguyen LT; Nguyen AH; Phan TN
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2015 Jun; 60(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 25754534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro evaluation of the safety and probiotic properties of Lactobacilli isolated from chicken and calves.
Bujnakova D; Strakova E; Kmet V
Anaerobe; 2014 Oct; 29():118-27. PubMed ID: 24291759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protection activity of a novel probiotic strain of Bacillus subtilis against Salmonella Enteritidis infection.
Thirabunyanon M; Thongwittaya N
Res Vet Sci; 2012 Aug; 93(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21907374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening of Bacillus strains as potential probiotics and subsequent confirmation of the in vivo effectiveness of Bacillus subtilis MA139 in pigs.
Guo X; Li D; Lu W; Piao X; Chen X
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2006 Aug; 90(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 16820971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety evaluation of two bacterial strains used in Asian probiotic products.
Tompkins TA; Hagen KE; Wallace TD; Fillion-Forté V
Can J Microbiol; 2008 May; 54(5):391-400. PubMed ID: 18449224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Isolation, selection and evaluation of Bacillus spp. as potential multi-mode probiotics for poultry.
Ramlucken U; Roets Y; Ramchuran SO; Moonsamy G; van Rensburg CJ; Thantsha MS; Lalloo R
J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2020 Sep; 66(4):228-238. PubMed ID: 32536637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety assessment of Bacillus subtilis CU1 for use as a probiotic in humans.
Lefevre M; Racedo SM; Denayrolles M; Ripert G; Desfougères T; Lobach AR; Simon R; Pélerin F; Jüsten P; Urdaci MC
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 83():54-65. PubMed ID: 27825987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Isolation of Marine
Zhou S; Xia Y; Zhu C; Chu W
Mar Drugs; 2018 Jun; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 29874792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Bacillus subtilis strain as probiotic in poultry: selection based on in vitro functional properties and enzymatic potentialities.
Hmani H; Daoud L; Jlidi M; Jalleli K; Ben Ali M; Hadj Brahim A; Bargui M; Dammak A; Ben Ali M
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Aug; 44(8):1157-1166. PubMed ID: 28439767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of Bacillus spp. strains for use as probiotic additives in pig feed.
Larsen N; Thorsen L; Kpikpi EN; Stuer-Lauridsen B; Cantor MD; Nielsen B; Brockmann E; Derkx PM; Jespersen L
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Feb; 98(3):1105-18. PubMed ID: 24201893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of hemolytic activity, enzyme production and bacteriocin characterization of Bacillus subtilis LR1 isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of fish.
Banerjee G; Nandi A; Ray AK
Arch Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 199(1):115-124. PubMed ID: 27590016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A simple method for determination of ability of bacteria to inactivate chemotherapeutics using sensitivity disc.
Kanazawa Y; Kuramata T
J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1966 Nov; 19(6):272-7. PubMed ID: 4291400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Possible correlation between levansucrase production and probiotic activity of Bacillus sp. isolated from honey and honey bee.
Hamdy AA; Elattal NA; Amin MA; Ali AE; Mansour NM; Awad GE; Awad HM; Esawy MA
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Apr; 33(4):69. PubMed ID: 28271385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Tentative Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Five Bacillus Species Relevant for Use as Animal Feed Additives or for Plant Protection.
Agersø Y; Stuer-Lauridsen B; Bjerre K; Jensen MG; Johansen E; Bennedsen M; Brockmann E; Nielsen B
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(19):. PubMed ID: 30030233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Subtractive screening for probiotic properties of lactobacillus species from the human gastrointestinal tract in the search for new probiotics.
Delgado S; O'Sullivan E; Fitzgerald G; Mayo B
J Food Sci; 2007 Oct; 72(8):M310-5. PubMed ID: 17995611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence characteristics and genotypes of Bacillus spp. from probiotic products of diverse origins.
Deng F; Chen Y; Sun T; Wu Y; Su Y; Liu C; Zhou J; Deng Y; Wen J
Food Res Int; 2021 Jan; 139():109949. PubMed ID: 33509502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of tetracycline and chloramphenicol resistance in digestive tracts of bulls and piglets fed with Toyocerin®, a feed additive containing Bacillus toyonensis spores.
Casanovas-Massana A; Sala-Comorera L; Blanch AR
Vet Microbiol; 2014 Sep; 173(1-2):59-65. PubMed ID: 25085518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of Lactobacillus gasseri isolates from a breast-fed infant.
Rodrigues da Cunha L; Fortes Ferreira CL; Durmaz E; Goh YJ; Sanozky-Dawes R; Klaenhammer T
Gut Microbes; 2012; 3(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 22555546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
