BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28332130)

  • 1. If You're a Rawlsian, How Come You're So Close to Utilitarianism and Intuitionism? A Critique of Daniels's Accountability for Reasonableness.
    Badano G
    Health Care Anal; 2018 Mar; 26(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28332130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What do district health planners in Tanzania think about improving priority setting using 'Accountability for reasonableness'?
    Mshana S; Shemilu H; Ndawi B; Momburi R; Olsen OE; Byskov J; Martin DK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Nov; 7():180. PubMed ID: 17997824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?
    Reeleder D; Martin DK; Keresztes C; Singer PA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2005 Jan; 5(1):8. PubMed ID: 15663792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers.
    Martin DK; Giacomini M; Singer PA
    Health Policy; 2002 Sep; 61(3):279-90. PubMed ID: 12098521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying Rawls to medical cases: an investigation into the usages of analytical philosophy.
    Shevory TC
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 10(4):749-64. PubMed ID: 3457860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Justice and procedure: how does "accountability for reasonableness" result in fair limit-setting decisions?
    Rid A
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jan; 35(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 19103936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical Dilemmas in Protecting Susceptible Subpopulations From Environmental Health Risks: Liberty, Utility, Fairness, and Accountability for Reasonableness.
    Resnik DB; MacDougall DR; Smith EM
    Am J Bioeth; 2018 Mar; 18(3):29-41. PubMed ID: 29466133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process.
    Schlander M
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jul; 34(7):534-9. PubMed ID: 18591289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real and alleged problems for Daniels's account of health justice.
    Kelleher JP
    J Med Philos; 2013 Aug; 38(4):388-99. PubMed ID: 23856477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?
    Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):766-73. PubMed ID: 19070414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Justice, health, and healthcare.
    Daniels N
    Am J Bioeth; 2001; 1(2):2-16. PubMed ID: 11951872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conceptualizations of fairness and legitimacy in the context of Ethiopian health priority setting: Reflections on the applicability of accountability for reasonableness.
    Petricca K; Bekele A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Dec; 18(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 28544136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health as normal function: a weak link in Daniels's theory of just health distribution.
    Krag E
    Bioethics; 2014 Oct; 28(8):427-35. PubMed ID: 23278443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond accountability for reasonableness.
    Friedman A
    Bioethics; 2008 Feb; 22(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 18251770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resource allocation in health care and the role of personal autonomy.
    Gandjour A
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Mar; 77(3):e44-50. PubMed ID: 25321862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SARS and hospital priority setting: a qualitative case study and evaluation.
    Bell JA; Hyland S; DePellegrin T; Upshur RE; Bernstein M; Martin DK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 4(1):36. PubMed ID: 15606924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rawlsian justice in healthcare: a response to Cox and Fritz.
    Sarela AI
    J Med Ethics; 2022 Jun; 48(6):413-415. PubMed ID: 33762297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health Justice and Rawls's Theory at Fifty: Will New Thinking about Health and Inequality Influence the Most Influential Account of Justice?
    Kniess J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51(6):44-50. PubMed ID: 34904731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Priority setting in health care: a complementary approach.
    Nunes R; Rego G
    Health Care Anal; 2014 Sep; 22(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 23512613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Priority setting in kidney transplantation: a qualitative study evaluating Swedish practices.
    Omar F; Tinghög G; Carlsson P; Omnell-Persson M; Welin S
    Scand J Public Health; 2013 Mar; 41(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 23287398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.