242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28332159)
1. Electromagnetically tracked personalized templates for surgical navigation.
Dickinson AWL; Zec ML; Pichora DR; Rasquinha BJ; Ellis RE
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jun; 12(6):1049-1058. PubMed ID: 28332159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative evaluation for accumulative calibration error and video-CT registration errors in electromagnetic-tracked endoscopy.
Liu SX; Gutiérrez LF; Stanton D
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 May; 6(3):407-19. PubMed ID: 20714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy assessment for the co-registration between optical and VIVE head-mounted display tracking.
Groves LA; Carnahan P; Allen DR; Adam R; Peters TM; Chen ECS
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Jul; 14(7):1207-1215. PubMed ID: 31069642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electromagnetic tracking in image-guided laparoscopic surgery: Comparison with optical tracking and feasibility study of a combined laparoscope and laparoscopic ultrasound system.
Xiao G; Bonmati E; Thompson S; Evans J; Hipwell J; Nikitichev D; Gurusamy K; Ourselin S; Hawkes DJ; Davidson B; Clarkson MJ
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5094-5104. PubMed ID: 30247765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fast calibration of electromagnetically tracked oblique-viewing rigid endoscopes.
Liu X; Rice CE; Shekhar R
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Oct; 12(10):1685-1695. PubMed ID: 28623479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of an electromagnetic navigation system in lateral skull base approaches.
Komune N; Matsushima K; Matsuo S; Safavi-Abbasi S; Matsumoto N; Rhoton AL
Laryngoscope; 2017 Feb; 127(2):450-459. PubMed ID: 27301466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Probe versus microscope: a comparison of different methods for image-to-patient registration.
Perwög M; Bardosi Z; Diakov G; Jeleff O; Kral F; Freysinger W
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Oct; 13(10):1539-1548. PubMed ID: 29869745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical Tracking, Registration, and Navigation Characterization for Image-guided Renal Interventions.
Jackson P; Simon R; Linte C
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():5081-5084. PubMed ID: 33019129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous Electromagnetic Tracking and Calibration for Dynamic Field Distortion Compensation.
Sadjadi H; Hashtrudi-Zaad K; Fichtinger G
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 63(8):1771-81. PubMed ID: 26595908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electromagnetic navigation versus fluoroscopy in aortic endovascular procedures: a phantom study.
Tystad Lund K; Tangen GA; Manstad-Hulaas F
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 27492068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A bronchoscopic navigation system using bronchoscope center calibration for accurate registration of electromagnetic tracker and CT volume without markers.
Luo X
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061913. PubMed ID: 24877824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional endovascular navigation with electromagnetic tracking: ex vivo and in vivo accuracy.
Manstad-Hulaas F; Tangen GA; Gruionu LG; Aadahl P; Hernes TA
J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Apr; 18(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 21521064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Augmented reality surgical navigation with ultrasound-assisted registration for pedicle screw placement: a pilot study.
Ma L; Zhao Z; Chen F; Zhang B; Fu L; Liao H
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2205-2215. PubMed ID: 28779275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electromagnetic tracking for registration and navigation in endovascular aneurysm repair: a phantom study.
de Lambert A; Esneault S; Lucas A; Haigron P; Cinquin P; Magne JL
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2012 Jun; 43(6):684-9. PubMed ID: 22487781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous localization and calibration for electromagnetic tracking systems.
Sadjadi H; Hashtrudi-Zaad K; Fichtinger G
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Jun; 12(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 26018294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy assessment for navigated maxillo-facial surgery using an electromagnetic tracking device.
Seeberger R; Kane G; Hoffmann J; Eggers G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 40(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 21459015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calibration of mobile-gantry computed tomography for surgical navigation.
Belkova A; Pichora DR; Ellis RE
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Apr; 11(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 26450109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Geometric calibration of markerless optical surgical navigation system.
Lin Q; Cai K; Yang R; Xiao W; Huang J; Zhan Y; Zhuang J
Int J Med Robot; 2019 Apr; 15(2):e1978. PubMed ID: 30556944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound-based navigation for open liver surgery using active liver tracking.
Smit JN; Kuhlmann KFD; Ivashchenko OV; Thomson BR; Langø T; Kok NFM; Fusaglia M; Ruers TJM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Oct; 17(10):1765-1773. PubMed ID: 35622201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electromagnetic tracking for catheter reconstruction in ultrasound-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy of the prostate.
Bharat S; Kung C; Dehghan E; Ravi A; Venugopal N; Bonillas A; Stanton D; Kruecker J
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(6):640-50. PubMed ID: 24929641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
