119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28333499)
1. Are applicants more likely to quit longer assessments? Examining the effect of assessment length on applicant attrition behavior.
Hardy JH; Gibson C; Sloan M; Carr A
J Appl Psychol; 2017 Jul; 102(7):1148-1158. PubMed ID: 28333499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part I.
Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 22000541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using practice employment tests to improve recruitment and personnel selection outcomes for organizations and job seekers.
Campion MC; Campion ED; Campion MA
J Appl Psychol; 2019 Sep; 104(9):1089-1102. PubMed ID: 30869924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes.
Chapman DS; Uggerslev KL; Carroll SA; Piasentin KA; Jones DA
J Appl Psychol; 2005 Sep; 90(5):928-44. PubMed ID: 16162065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrimination against facially stigmatized applicants in interviews: an eye-tracking and face-to-face investigation.
Madera JM; Hebl MR
J Appl Psychol; 2012 Mar; 97(2):317-30. PubMed ID: 22004221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Facial attractiveness, applicants' qualifications, and judges' expertise about decisions in preselective recruitment.
Dubois M; Pansu P
Psychol Rep; 2004 Dec; 95(3 Pt 2):1129-34. PubMed ID: 15762393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-employment decision trees: job applicant self-election.
Liberman A; Rotarius T
Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2000 Jun; 18(4):48-54. PubMed ID: 10947403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.
Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The nonlinear relationship between atypical applicant experience and hiring: The red flags perspective.
Wechtler HM; Lee CISG; Heyden MLM; Felps W; Lee TW
J Appl Psychol; 2022 May; 107(5):776-794. PubMed ID: 34591559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The decline and rise of the medical school applicant pool.
Kassebaum DG; Szenas PL
Acad Med; 1995 Apr; 70(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 7718069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Context in selection of men and women in hiring decisions: gender composition of the applicant pool.
van Ommeren J; de Vries RE; Russo G; van Ommeren M
Psychol Rep; 2005 Apr; 96(2):349-60. PubMed ID: 15941109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Searching for the right fit: development of applicant person-organization fit perceptions during the recruitment process.
Swider BW; Zimmerman RD; Barrick MR
J Appl Psychol; 2015 May; 100(3):880-93. PubMed ID: 25486257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection.
Honkaniemi L; Tolvanen A; Feldt T
Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 21752026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of applicant age, job level, and accountability on perceptions of female job applicants.
Gordon RA; Rozelle RM; Baxter JC
J Psychol; 1989 Jan; 123(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 2926689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accents in the workplace: their effects during a job interview.
Deprez-Sims AS; Morris SB
Int J Psychol; 2010 Dec; 45(6):417-26. PubMed ID: 22044081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Who r u?: On the (in)accuracy of incumbent-based estimates of range restriction in criterion-related and differential validity research.
Roth PL; Le H; Oh IS; Van Iddekinge CH; Robbins SB
J Appl Psychol; 2017 May; 102(5):802-828. PubMed ID: 28150987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of Behavioral Interviewing Performance With Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applicant Characteristics☆?>.
Breitkopf DM; Vaughan LE; Hopkins MR
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):954-958. PubMed ID: 27321984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interviewer predictions of applicant qualifications and interviewer validity: aggregate and individual analyses.
Kinicki AJ; Lockwood CA; Hom PW; Griffeth RW
J Appl Psychol; 1990 Oct; 75(5):477-86. PubMed ID: 2266063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An examination of applicant characteristics of successfully matched interns: is the glass half full or half empty and leaking miserably?
Callahan JL; Collins FL; Klonoff EA
J Clin Psychol; 2010 Jan; 66(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19941327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for cognitive ability tests: implications for range restriction corrections in validation research.
Sackett PR; Ostgaard DJ
J Appl Psychol; 1994 Oct; 79(5):680-4. PubMed ID: 7989275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
