These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28334132)

  • 1. Maximum likelihood estimation and EM algorithm of Copas-like selection model for publication bias correction.
    Ning J; Chen Y; Piao J
    Biostatistics; 2017 Jul; 18(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 28334132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Copas-like selection model to correct publication bias in systematic review of diagnostic test studies.
    Piao J; Liu Y; Chen Y; Ning J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):2912-2923. PubMed ID: 30062910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EMBRACE: An EM-based bias reduction approach through Copas-model estimation for quantifying the evidence of selective publishing in network meta-analysis.
    Marks-Anglin A; Luo C; Piao J; Gibbons MBC; Schmid CH; Ning J; Chen Y
    Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):754-765. PubMed ID: 33559881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using clinical trial registries to inform Copas selection model for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Huang A; Komukai S; Friede T; Hattori S
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Sep; 12(5):658-673. PubMed ID: 34169657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.
    Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Rücker G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 19836925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A likelihood-based sensitivity analysis for publication bias on the summary receiver operating characteristic in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Zhou Y; Huang A; Hattori S
    Stat Med; 2023 Mar; 42(6):781-798. PubMed ID: 36584693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A selection model for accounting for publication bias in a full network meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; Welton NJ; Sutton A; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(30):5399-412. PubMed ID: 25316006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.
    Hattori S; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 28990209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting and correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis - A truncated normal distribution approach.
    Zhu Q; Carriere KC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2722-2741. PubMed ID: 28024447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing robustness against potential publication bias in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses for fMRI.
    Acar F; Seurinck R; Eickhoff SB; Moerkerke B
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0208177. PubMed ID: 30500854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; Sutton A; Cipriani A; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 22806991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of sparse data based on exact likelihood.
    Hu T; Zhou Y; Hattori S
    Biometrics; 2024 Jul; 80(3):. PubMed ID: 39253987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The use of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of gametic frequencies of multilocus polymorphic codominant systems based on sampled population data].
    Sergeev AS; Arapova RK
    Genetika; 2002 Mar; 38(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 11963570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the sensitivity of meta-analysis to selection bias: a multiple imputation approach.
    Carpenter J; Rücker G; Schwarzer G
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1066-72. PubMed ID: 21039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximum likelihood inference for multivariate frailty models using an automated Monte Carlo EM algorithm.
    Ripatti S; Larsen K; Palmgren J
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2002 Dec; 8(4):349-60. PubMed ID: 12471944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Employing a Monte Carlo algorithm in expectation maximization restricted maximum likelihood estimation of the linear mixed model.
    Matilainen K; Mäntysaari EA; Lidauer MH; Strandén I; Thompson R
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Dec; 129(6):457-68. PubMed ID: 23148971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Orthogonally Partitioned EM Algorithm: Extending the EM Algorithm for Algorithmic Stability and Bias Correction Due to Imperfect Data.
    Regier MD; Moodie EE
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 27227718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation for zero-inflated beta-binomial regression model with missing response data.
    Luo R; Paul S
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(26):3789-3813. PubMed ID: 29888415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.