595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28334282)
1. Comprehensive assessment of flexible-ligand docking algorithms: current effectiveness and challenges.
Huang SY
Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):982-994. PubMed ID: 28334282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LS-align: an atom-level, flexible ligand structural alignment algorithm for high-throughput virtual screening.
Hu J; Liu Z; Yu DJ; Zhang Y
Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):2209-2218. PubMed ID: 29462237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advances in Docking.
Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flexible CDOCKER: Hybrid Searching Algorithm and Scoring Function with Side Chain Conformational Entropy.
Wu Y; Brooks CL
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Nov; 61(11):5535-5549. PubMed ID: 34704754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PSOVina: The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking.
Ng MC; Fong S; Siu SW
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(3):1541007. PubMed ID: 25800162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CRDOCK: an ultrafast multipurpose protein-ligand docking tool.
Cortés Cabrera Á; Klett J; Dos Santos HG; Perona A; Gil-Redondo R; Francis SM; Priego EM; Gago F; Morreale A
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Aug; 52(8):2300-9. PubMed ID: 22764680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SABRE: ligand/structure-based virtual screening approach using consensus molecular-shape pattern recognition.
Wei NN; Hamza A
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):338-46. PubMed ID: 24328054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flexible ligand docking with Glide.
Repasky MP; Shelley M; Friesner RA
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; Chapter 8():Unit 8.12. PubMed ID: 18428795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
Kumar SP
J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.
Forli S; Huey R; Pique ME; Sanner MF; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ
Nat Protoc; 2016 May; 11(5):905-19. PubMed ID: 27077332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Negative Image-Based Screening: Rigid Docking Using Cavity Information.
Postila PA; Kurkinen ST; Pentikäinen OT
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():125-140. PubMed ID: 33759124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design.
Antunes DA; Devaurs D; Kavraki LE
Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 Dec; 10(12):1301-13. PubMed ID: 26414598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrating sampling techniques and inverse virtual screening: toward the discovery of artificial peptide-based receptors for ligands.
Pérez GM; Salomón LA; Montero-Cabrera LA; de la Vega JM; Mascini M
Mol Divers; 2016 May; 20(2):421-38. PubMed ID: 26553204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular Dynamics as a Tool for Virtual Ligand Screening.
Menchon G; Maveyraud L; Czaplicki G
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():145-178. PubMed ID: 29594772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
