These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

565 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28335799)

  • 1. Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence.
    Hong QN; Pluye P; Bujold M; Wassef M
    Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 6(1):61. PubMed ID: 28335799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.
    Stern C; Lizarondo L; Carrier J; Godfrey C; Rieger K; Salmond S; Apostolo J; Kirkpatrick P; Loveday H
    JBI Evid Implement; 2021 Jun; 19(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 34061049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.
    Stern C; Lizarondo L; Carrier J; Godfrey C; Rieger K; Salmond S; Apóstolo J; Kirkpatrick P; Loveday H
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Oct; 18(10):2108-2118. PubMed ID: 32813460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing methods for the overarching synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence: The interweave synthesis approach.
    Thompson Coon J; Gwernan-Jones R; Garside R; Nunns M; Shaw L; Melendez-Torres GJ; Moore D
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jul; 11(4):507-521. PubMed ID: 31725951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
    Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 5: methods for integrating qualitative and implementation evidence within intervention effectiveness reviews.
    Harden A; Thomas J; Cargo M; Harris J; Pantoja T; Flemming K; Booth A; Garside R; Hannes K; Noyes J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():70-78. PubMed ID: 29242095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applications of mixed-methods methodology in clinical pharmacy research.
    Hadi MA; Closs SJ
    Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Jun; 38(3):635-40. PubMed ID: 26659085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variations of mixed methods reviews approaches: A case study.
    Hong QN; Rees R; Sutcliffe K; Thomas J
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):795-811. PubMed ID: 32681590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential value of systematic reviews of qualitative evidence in informing user-centered health and social care: findings from a descriptive overview.
    Dalton J; Booth A; Noyes J; Sowden AJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():37-46. PubMed ID: 28450254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Results in Health Science Mixed Methods Research Through Joint Displays.
    Guetterman TC; Fetters MD; Creswell JW
    Ann Fam Med; 2015 Nov; 13(6):554-61. PubMed ID: 26553895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed methods synthesis in systematic mixed studies reviews: Guidance and a worked example.
    El Sherif R; Pluye P; Hong QN; Rihoux B
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):450-465. PubMed ID: 38194944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mixed-methods research in nephrology.
    Bailey PK; Hole BD; Plumb LA; Caskey FJ
    Kidney Int; 2022 May; 101(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 35227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The experiences of adults who are on dialysis and waiting for a renal transplant from a deceased donor: a systematic review.
    Burns T; Fernandez R; Stephens M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Mar; 13(2):169-211. PubMed ID: 26447040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 6: reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses.
    Flemming K; Booth A; Hannes K; Cargo M; Noyes J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():79-85. PubMed ID: 29222060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
    MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women's experience of menopause: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.
    Hoga L; Rodolpho J; Gonçalves B; Quirino B
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Sep; 13(8):250-337. PubMed ID: 26455946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.