421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28337460)
21. Anatomic consideration of caudal epidural space: a cadaver study.
Aggarwal A; Kaur H; Batra YK; Aggarwal AK; Rajeev S; Sahni D
Clin Anat; 2009 Sep; 22(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 19637298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A randomized comparison of caudal block by sacral hiatus injection under ultrasound guidance with traditional sacral canal injection in children.
Wang LZ; Hu XX; Zhang YF; Chang XY
Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 May; 23(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 23278906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ultrasonographic anatomy of the sacrococcygeal region and ultrasound-guided epidural injection at the sacrococcygeal space in dogs.
Gregori T; Viscasillas J; Benigni L
Vet Rec; 2014 Jul; 175(3):68. PubMed ID: 24821855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Confirmation of success rate of landmark-based caudal blockade in children using ultrasound: A prospective analysis.
Boretsky KR; Camelo C; Waisel DB; Falciola V; Sullivan C; Brusseau E; Eastburn E; Gomez-Moraz A; Luckanavanich W
Paediatr Anaesth; 2020 Jun; 30(6):671-675. PubMed ID: 32267040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Lumbar epidural anesthesia as an alternative to sacral epidural block].
Rucci FS; Pinto L; Cardamone M
Minerva Anestesiol; 1980 Jan; 46(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 7366863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The level of termination of the dural sac by MRI and its clinical relevance in caudal epidural block in adults.
Senoglu N; Senoglu M; Ozkan F; Kesilmez C; Kızıldag B; Celik M
Surg Radiol Anat; 2013 Sep; 35(7):579-84. PubMed ID: 23515954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Anatomical differences in sacral hiatus during caudal epidural injection with ultrasonography guidance and its effects on success rate].
Gökçek E; Kaydu A
Agri; 2020 Jan; 32(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 32030697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Anatomical Evaluation of the Sacral Hiatus Using Ultrasound Imaging: Factors That Inhibit Needle Insertion During Caudal Epidural Block Procedures.
Nakahashi M; Uei H; Hoshino M; Omori K; Igarashi H; Tokuhashi Y
Pain Pract; 2020 Jan; 20(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 31376336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided caudal epidural steroid injection in patients with low back pain and sciatica.
Klunklin K; Sangsin A; Leerapun T
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2022; 35(2):317-322. PubMed ID: 34366319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and radiculitis.
Manchikanti L; Singh V; Cash KA; Pampati V; Damron KS; Boswell MV
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1897-905. PubMed ID: 21897343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Epidural steroid injections for low back pain.
Stout A
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2010 Nov; 21(4):825-34. PubMed ID: 20977965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of epidural catheter on the incidence of intravascular injection during caudal block.
Lee JY; Lee SH; Sim WS; Kim DK; Lee SH; Yun HM; Park HJ
Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Dec; 46(12):1707-1713. PubMed ID: 28799128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of Ultrasonography and Conventional Fluoroscopy Guided Caudal Epidural Injection in Chronic Low Back Pain.
Senkal S; Sir E
Turk Neurosurg; 2021; 31(1):119-123. PubMed ID: 33372261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the incidence of intravascular injection using the Tuohy and Quincke needles during ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Kim JY; Lee JS; Kim JY; Baek JW; Kim HS; Kim DH
Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2024 Jan; 49(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 37169489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Performing fluoroscopically guided interlaminar lumbar epidural injections.
Rosas HG; Lee KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):419. PubMed ID: 22826406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Caudal epidural injection.
Howe D
Can J Rural Med; 2012; 17(4):145-7. PubMed ID: 23017348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Descriptive Cadaveric Study Comparing the Accuracy of Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopic Guidance for First Sacral Transforaminal Injections: A Comparison Study.
Thompson BF; Pingree MJ; Qu W; Murthy NS; Lachman N; Hurdle MF
PM R; 2018 Apr; 10(4):382-390. PubMed ID: 28943459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analysis of efficacy differences between caudal and lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in chronic lumbar axial discogenic pain: local anesthetic alone vs. local combined with steroids.
Manchikanti L; Pampati V; Benyamin RM; Boswell MV
Int J Med Sci; 2015; 12(3):214-22. PubMed ID: 25678838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transforaminal versus parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injection in low back pain with radicular pain: a randomized, double-blind, active-control trial.
Ghai B; Bansal D; Kay JP; Vadaje KS; Wig J
Pain Physician; 2014; 17(4):277-90. PubMed ID: 25054387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Use of Contrast in Caudal Epidural Injections under Image Intensifier Guidance: Is It Necessary?
Naidoo K; Alazzawi S; Montgomery A
Clin Orthop Surg; 2017 Jun; 9(2):190-192. PubMed ID: 28567221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
