702 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28337594)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of high-risk HPV DNA genotyping for primary cervical cancer screening and triage of HPV-positive women, compared to cytology: preliminary results of the PIPAVIR study.
Chatzistamatiou K; Moysiadis T; Angelis E; Kaufmann A; Skenderi A; Jansen-Duerr P; Lekka I; Kilintzis V; Angelidou S; Katsiki E; Hagemann I; Tsertanidou A; Koch I; Boecher O; Soutschek E; Maglaveras N; Agorastos T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1247-1257. PubMed ID: 28337594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human papillomavirus E7 protein detection as a method of triage to colposcopy of HPV positive women, in comparison to genotyping and cytology. Final results of the PIPAVIR study.
Agorastos T; Chatzistamatiou K; Moysiadis T; Kaufmann AM; Skenderi A; Lekka I; Koch I; Soutschek E; Boecher O; Kilintzis V; Angelidou S; Katsiki E; Hagemann I; Boschetti Gruetzmacher E; Tsertanidou A; Angelis L; Maglaveras N; Jansen-Duerr P
Int J Cancer; 2017 Aug; 141(3):519-530. PubMed ID: 28470689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.
Song F; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Wu R;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.
Torres-Ibarra L; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT; Spiegelman D; Lazcano-Ponce E; Franco EL; Moscicki AB; Mahmud SM; Wheeler CM; Rivera-Paredez B; Hernández-López R; León-Maldonado L; Salmerón J;
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1915781. PubMed ID: 31747033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of different strategies for the triage to colposcopy of women tested high-risk HPV positive on self-collected cervicovaginal samples.
Chatzistamatiou K; Tsertanidou A; Moysiadis T; Mouchtaropoulou E; Pasentsis K; Skenderi A; Stamatopoulos K; Agorastos T
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Sep; 162(3):560-568. PubMed ID: 34210517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methylation estimates the risk of precancer in HPV-infected women with discrepant results between cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping.
Hernández-López R; Lorincz AT; Torres-Ibarra L; Reuter C; Scibior-Bentkowska D; Warman R; Nedjai B; Mendiola-Pastrana I; León-Maldonado L; Rivera-Paredez B; Ramírez-Palacios P; Lazcano-Ponce E; Cuzick J; Salmerón J;
Clin Epigenetics; 2019 Oct; 11(1):140. PubMed ID: 31606044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary screening for cervical cancer based on high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) detection and HPV 16 and HPV 18 genotyping, in comparison to cytology.
Agorastos T; Chatzistamatiou K; Katsamagkas T; Koliopoulos G; Daponte A; Constantinidis T; Constantinidis TC;
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119755. PubMed ID: 25793281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined use of cytology, p16 immunostaining and genotyping for triage of women positive for high-risk human papillomavirus at primary screening.
Cuzick J; Adcock R; Carozzi F; Gillio-Tos A; De Marco L; Del Mistro A; Frayle H; Girlando S; Sani C; Confortini M; Zorzi M; Giorgi-Rossi P; Rizzolo R; Ronco G;
Int J Cancer; 2020 Oct; 147(7):1864-1873. PubMed ID: 32170961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary hrHPV DNA testing in cervical cancer screening: how to manage screen-positive women? A POBASCAM trial substudy.
Dijkstra MG; van Niekerk D; Rijkaart DC; van Kemenade FJ; Heideman DA; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; Berkhof J
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Jan; 23(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 23733907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing: a pooled analysis using the data from 13 population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China.
Pan QJ; Hu SY; Guo HQ; Zhang WH; Zhang X; Chen W; Cao J; Jiang Y; Zhao FH; Qiao YL
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 24631450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-year longitudinal data on the clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in a cervical cancer screening setting.
Poljak M; Oštrbenk A; Seme K; Šterbenc A; Jančar N; Vrtačnik Bokal E
J Clin Virol; 2016 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():S29-S39. PubMed ID: 26643051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of cytology, HPV DNA testing and HPV 16/18 genotyping alone or combined targeting to the more balanced methodology for cervical cancer screening.
Chatzistamatiou K; Moysiadis T; Moschaki V; Panteleris N; Agorastos T
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 142(1):120-127. PubMed ID: 27126005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of human papillomavirus 16/18 oncoprotein test for cervical cancer screening and HPV positive women triage.
Yu L; Jiang M; Qu P; Wu Z; Sun P; Xi M; Qin Y; Liu X; Liao G; Lei X; Sun L; Zhang Y; Li Z; Chen W; Qiao YL
Int J Cancer; 2018 Aug; 143(4):813-822. PubMed ID: 29524206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.
Aoyama-Kikawa S; Fujita H; Hanley SJB; Kasamo M; Kikuchi K; Torigoe T; Matsuno Y; Tamakoshi A; Sasaki T; Matsuura M; Kato Y; Dong P; Watari H; Saito T; Sengoku K; Sakuragi N
Cancer Sci; 2018 Jun; 109(6):2003-2012. PubMed ID: 29660849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of HPV16/18 in Triage of Cytological Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance.
Cao X; Liu S; Jia M; Chen H; Zhao D; Dong B; Guo Z; Ren L; Zhang S; Sun X
Anal Cell Pathol (Amst); 2019; 2019():4324710. PubMed ID: 31934532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Performance of vaginal self-sampling high-risk HPV genotyping as primary and combining cytology or viral load as secondary in cervical cancer screening].
Guo CL; Luo HX; Wang C; Qu XF; Yang B; Belinson JL; Du H; Wu RF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 56(4):271-279. PubMed ID: 33902239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) using HPV DNA testing after a diagnosis of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) in Catalonia, Spain.
Ibáñez R; Moreno-Crespi J; Sardà M; Autonell J; Fibla M; Gutiérrez C; Lloveras B; Alejo M; Català I; Alameda F; Casas M; Bosch FX; de Sanjosé S
BMC Infect Dis; 2012 Jan; 12():25. PubMed ID: 22280073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human papillomavirus viral load as a useful triage tool for non-16/18 high-risk human papillomavirus positive women: A prospective screening cohort study.
Dong L; Wang MZ; Zhao XL; Feng RM; Hu SY; Zhang Q; Smith JS; Qiao YL; Zhao FH
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jan; 148(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 29169614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
