These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28337604)

  • 1. Adjustment of control in the numerical Stroop task.
    Dadon G; Henik A
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Aug; 45(6):891-902. PubMed ID: 28337604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which digit is larger? Brain responses to number and size interactions in a numerical Stroop task.
    Huang HW; Nascimben M; Wang YY; Fong DY; Tzeng OJ; Huang CM
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Mar; 58(3):e13744. PubMed ID: 33314155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J; Bereby-Meyer Y; Shahar N
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):913-27. PubMed ID: 25420632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Congruency proportion reveals asymmetric processing of irrelevant physical and numerical dimensions in the size congruity paradigm.
    Borgmann K; Fugelsang J; Ansari D; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 21668091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task conflict and proactive control: A computational theory of the Stroop task.
    Kalanthroff E; Davelaar EJ; Henik A; Goldfarb L; Usher M
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Jan; 125(1):59-82. PubMed ID: 29035077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: an event-related fMRI study.
    Kaufmann L; Koppelstaetter F; Delazer M; Siedentopf C; Rhomberg P; Golaszewski S; Felber S; Ischebeck A
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):888-98. PubMed ID: 15808989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):579-92. PubMed ID: 22390293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reevaluating the two-representation model of numerical magnitude processing.
    Jiang T; Zhang W; Wen W; Zhu H; Du H; Zhu X; Gao X; Zhang H; Dong Q; Chen C
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 26268066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinct cognitive control mechanisms as revealed by modality-specific conflict adaptation effects.
    Yang G; Nan W; Zheng Y; Wu H; Li Q; Liu X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):807-818. PubMed ID: 28345947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive control controls the effect of irrelevant stimulus-response learning.
    Shi K; Wang L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):866-882. PubMed ID: 38413504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.
    Pires L; Leitão J; Guerrini C; Simões MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():63-75. PubMed ID: 28683927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual but not fragile: individual differences in task control predict Stroop facilitation.
    Kalanthroff E; Henik A
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 23416541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Congruency sequence effect in cross-task context: evidence for dimension-specific modulation.
    Lee J; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):617-27. PubMed ID: 24184348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect.
    Shichel I; Tzelgov J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():93-102. PubMed ID: 29078981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Event-related potentials dissociate facilitation and interference effects in the numerical Stroop paradigm.
    Szucs D; Soltész F
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Nov; 45(14):3190-202. PubMed ID: 17675108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual search for conjunctions of physical and numerical size shows that they are processed independently.
    Sobel KV; Puri AM; Faulkenberry TJ; Dague TD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):444-453. PubMed ID: 27893271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.
    Bugg JM; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):433-49. PubMed ID: 22845037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An integrated utility-based model of conflict evaluation and resolution in the Stroop task.
    Chuderski A; Smolen T
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Apr; 123(3):255-90. PubMed ID: 26751852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numerical and physical magnitudes are mapped into time.
    Ben-Meir S; Ganor-Stern D; Tzelgov J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2309-20. PubMed ID: 22643130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.