BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28337653)

  • 1. Letter to the Editor: Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
    Pritchett JW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 475(6):1747-1748. PubMed ID: 28337653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
    Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):300-303. PubMed ID: 27844400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The mean ten-year results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1424-1433. PubMed ID: 30418058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraoperative Complications and Mid-Term Follow-Up of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
    Miettinen SSA; Mäkinen TJ; Mäkelä K; Huhtala H; Kettunen JS; Remes V
    Scand J Surg; 2018 Jun; 107(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 29333941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
    Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Junnila M; Kostensalo I; Virolainen P; Remes V; Matilainen M; Vahlberg T; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Itälä A; Mäkelä K
    Scand J Surg; 2014 Mar; 103(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 24345980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with large diameter metal-on-metal heads: short-term survivorship of 8059 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Mokka J; Mäkelä KT; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A
    Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23820688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes of Revision Surgery for "Pseudotumors" in Patients With Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
    Liow MH; Dimitriou D; Tsai TY; Kwon YM
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2835-2842. PubMed ID: 27387480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes after revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Gross TP; Liu F
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):219-23. PubMed ID: 24997652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response to Letter to the Editor concerning "How symmetric are metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients during gait? Insights for the rehabilitation".
    Resende RA; Kirkwood RN; Rudan JF; Deluzio KJ
    J Biomech; 2017 Oct; 63():204-205. PubMed ID: 28844724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
    Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metal ion levels and revision rates in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study.
    Robinson PG; Wilkinson AJ; Meek RM
    Hip Int; 2014; 24(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 24500833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcome of revision arthroplasty for failed metal-on-metal total hip replacements; is there a relation with metal ions?
    Iqbal HJ; Al-Azzani WAK; Jackson-Taylor E; Clatworthy E; John A
    Hip Int; 2017 May; 27(3):235-240. PubMed ID: 28165602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revision rates for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty - a systematic review.
    Ras Sørensen SL; Jørgensen HL; Sporing SL; Lauritzen JB
    Hip Int; 2016 Nov; 26(6):515-521. PubMed ID: 27791245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. There Are No Differences in Short- to Mid-term Survivorship Among Total Hip-bearing Surface Options: A Network Meta-analysis.
    Wyles CC; Jimenez-Almonte JH; Murad MH; Norambuena-Morales GA; Cabanela ME; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2031-41. PubMed ID: 25516002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients under 30 years of age.
    Woon RP; Johnson AJ; Amstutz HC
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jun; 28(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 23433997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do Complication Rates Differ by Gender After Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.
    Haughom BD; Erickson BJ; Hellman MD; Jacobs JJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2521-9. PubMed ID: 25758375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.
    Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR
    Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.