These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28337862)

  • 1. Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a 1D vascular model with Gaussian process emulators.
    Melis A; Clayton RH; Marzo A
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 33(12):. PubMed ID: 28337862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian Sensitivity Analysis of a Cardiac Cell Model Using a Gaussian Process Emulator.
    Chang ET; Strong M; Clayton RH
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130252. PubMed ID: 26114610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emulator-Based Bayesian Calibration of the CISNET Colorectal Cancer Models.
    Pineda-Antunez C; Seguin C; van Duuren LA; Knudsen AB; Davidi B; Nascimento de Lima P; Rutter C; Kuntz KM; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Collier N; Ozik J; Alarid-Escudero F
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Jun; ():272989X241255618. PubMed ID: 38858832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Two Human Atrial Cardiac Cell Models Using Gaussian Process Emulators.
    Coveney S; Clayton RH
    Front Physiol; 2020; 11():364. PubMed ID: 32390867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personalization of models with many model parameters: an efficient sensitivity analysis approach.
    Donders WP; Huberts W; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 26017545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Global sensitivity analysis with multifidelity Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos expansion for vascular haemodynamics.
    Schäfer F; Schiavazzi DE; Hellevik LR; Sturdy J
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2024 Jun; ():e3836. PubMed ID: 38837871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating Parameter Uncertainty in a Simulation Model of Cancer Using Emulators.
    de Carvalho TM; Heijnsdijk EAM; Coffeng L; de Koning HJ
    Med Decis Making; 2019 May; 39(4):405-413. PubMed ID: 31179833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fitting two human atrial cell models to experimental data using Bayesian history matching.
    Coveney S; Clayton RH
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2018 Nov; 139():43-58. PubMed ID: 30145156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coupled Monte Carlo simulation and Copula theory for uncertainty analysis of multiphase flow simulation models.
    Jiang X; Na J; Lu W; Zhang Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(31):24284-24296. PubMed ID: 28889205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards efficient uncertainty quantification in complex and large-scale biomechanical problems based on a Bayesian multi-fidelity scheme.
    Biehler J; Gee MW; Wall WA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jun; 14(3):489-513. PubMed ID: 25245816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emulator-based Bayesian calibration of the CISNET colorectal cancer models.
    Pineda-Antunez C; Seguin C; van Duuren LA; Knudsen AB; Davidi B; de Lima PN; Rutter C; Kuntz KM; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Collier N; Ozik J; Alarid-Escudero F
    medRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36909607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surrogate-based Bayesian calibration of biomechanical models with isotropic material behavior.
    Römer U; Liu J; Böl M
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Apr; 38(4):e3575. PubMed ID: 35094499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation in molecular dynamics simulations: a high performance computing framework.
    Angelikopoulos P; Papadimitriou C; Koumoutsakos P
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Oct; 137(14):144103. PubMed ID: 23061835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient computation of partial expected value of sample information using Bayesian approximation.
    Brennan A; Kharroubi SA
    J Health Econ; 2007 Jan; 26(1):122-48. PubMed ID: 16945438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variance-based sensitivity analysis of biological uncertainties in carbon ion therapy.
    Kamp F; Brüningk S; Cabal G; Mairani A; Parodi K; Wilkens JJ
    Phys Med; 2014 Jul; 30(5):583-7. PubMed ID: 24870245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of Monte Carlo-based Bayesian parameter estimation methods for stochastic models of genetic networks.
    Mariño IP; Zaikin A; Míguez J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182015. PubMed ID: 28797087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity analysis and estimation of extreme tail behavior in two-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation.
    Roelofs VJ; Kennedy MC
    Risk Anal; 2011 Oct; 31(10):1597-609. PubMed ID: 21418084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parameter inference for a stochastic kinetic model of expanded polyglutamine proteins.
    Fisher HF; Boys RJ; Gillespie CS; Proctor CJ; Golightly A
    Biometrics; 2022 Sep; 78(3):1195-1208. PubMed ID: 33837525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using information on uncertainty to improve environmental fate modeling: a case study on DDT.
    Schenker U; Scheringer M; Sohn MD; Maddalena RL; McKone TE; Hungerbühler K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jan; 43(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 19209595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.