256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28338036)
1. To cord or not to cord? That is still a question.
Veitz-Keenan A; Keenan JR
Evid Based Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 28338036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency of Cordless Versus Cord Techniques of Gingival Retraction: A Systematic Review.
Huang C; Somar M; Li K; Mohadeb JVN
J Prosthodont; 2017 Apr; 26(3):177-185. PubMed ID: 26378615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords, an aluminum chloride paste, and a combination of paste and cords for tissue displacement.
Einarsdottir ER; Lang NP; Aspelund T; Pjetursson BE
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 28478985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gingival Retraction Methods: A Systematic Review.
Tabassum S; Adnan S; Khan FR
J Prosthodont; 2017 Dec; 26(8):637-643. PubMed ID: 27465933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang Y; Fan F; Li X; Zhou Q; He B; Huang X; Huang S; Ma J
Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(3):234-244. PubMed ID: 30773575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Gingival retraction paste versus gingival retraction cord for fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review].
Hong LG; Guo LP; Xue LL
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2013 Aug; 22(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 24100909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste.
Bennani V; Aarts JM; Brunton P
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jun; 32(4):410-415. PubMed ID: 32442353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calcium sodium phosphosilicate had some benefit on dentine hypersensitivity.
Freda NM; Veitz-Keenan A
Evid Based Dent; 2016 Mar; 17(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 27012568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop.
Kim DM; Neiva R
J Periodontol; 2015 Feb; 86(2 Suppl):S56-72. PubMed ID: 25644300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Three New Gingival Retraction Systems: A Comparative Study.
Kumari S; Singh P; Parmar UG; Patel AM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):922-927. PubMed ID: 34753845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of the effect of impregnated retraction cord versus laser on gingival attachment level and pain perception following retraction for subgingival margins - A prospective, split-mouth, controlled, clinical study.
Diwan V; Chauhan MR; Tembhurne J; Gangurde A; Wani H; Danane S
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Apr; 24(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 38650338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Picot J; Jones J; Colquitt JL; Gospodarevskaya E; Loveman E; Baxter L; Clegg AJ
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Sep; 13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19726018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of gingival displacement, bleeding and ease of application for polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and conventional retraction cord - a clinical trial.
Nasim H; Lone MA; Kumar B; Ahmed N; Farooqui WA; Alsahhaf A; Alresayes S; Vohra F; Abduljabbar T
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Mar; 27(6):2222-2231. PubMed ID: 37013740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A double-blind randomised clinical trial of two techniques for gingival displacement.
Sarmento HR; Leite FR; Dantas RV; Ogliari FA; Demarco FF; Faot F
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Apr; 41(4):306-13. PubMed ID: 24446590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
