These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Essential oil mouthwash (EOMW) may be equivalent to chlorhexidine (CHX) for long-term control of gingival inflammation but CHX appears to perform better than EOMW in plaque control. Neely AL J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):69-72. PubMed ID: 23253835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques. Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ; Jekki R; Won J Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 58(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 24286645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns. Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effectiveness of ayurvedic oil-based nasal instillation (Nasya) medicines in the treatment of facial paralysis (Ardita): a systematic review. Vivera MJ; Gomersall JS JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):198-228. PubMed ID: 27532316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preimpression troughing with the diode laser: A preliminary study. Stuffken M; Vahidi F J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 26723098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Gingival displacement using diode laser or retraction cords: A comparative clinical study. Melilli D; Mauceri R; Albanese A; Matranga D; Pizzo G Am J Dent; 2018 Jun; 31(3):131-134. PubMed ID: 30028930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical Assessment of Gingival Sulcus Width using Various Gingival Displacement Materials. Goutham GB; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A; Ramanna PK; Joy J J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 29807958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Efficacy of conventional cord versus cordless techniques for gingival displacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Martins FV; Santana RB; Fonseca EM J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 32008797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study. Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of retraction paste to simplify impression and cementation of ceramic veneers and crowns: 3-year follow-up report. Andreiuolo RF; Abreu JLB; Hirata R Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):604-610. PubMed ID: 31286117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of gingival displacement methods in terms of periodontal health at crown restorations produced by digital scan: 1-year clinical follow-up. Ünalan Değirmenci B; Karadağ Naldemir B; Değirmenci A Lasers Med Sci; 2021 Aug; 36(6):1323-1335. PubMed ID: 33566189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of Gingival Displacement with Aluminum Chloride and Naphazoline Hydrochloride: A Randomized Controlled Trial. de Carvalho WF; Junior LCV; Junior HFB; Suguiura TPDS; Previdelli ITS; Sábio S Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Feb; 29(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 33026719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]