These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28338036)

  • 41. How do periodontal indices compare among non-smokers, tobacco and e-cigarette smokers?
    Robbins J; Ali K
    Evid Based Dent; 2022 Sep; 23(3):116-117. PubMed ID: 36151288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.
    Chandra S; Singh A; Gupta KK; Chandra C; Arora V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 26443067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of four cordless gingival displacement systems: A clinical study.
    Rayyan MM; Hussien ANM; Sayed NM; Abdallah R; Osman E; El Saad NA; Ramadan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):265-270. PubMed ID: 30722986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Diagnostic efficacy of direct and indirect digital imaging for approximal caries.
    Yeung JS; Hurst D
    Evid Based Dent; 2018 Oct; 19(3):71-72. PubMed ID: 30361664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Gingival Displacement Using Three Recent Gingival Retraction Systems -
    Qureshi SM; Anasane NS; Kakade D
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2020; 11(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 33110305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparative Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Four Different Gingival Retraction Systems: An In Vivo Study.
    Madaan R; Paliwal J; Sharma V; Meena KK; Dadarwal A; Kumar R
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e23923. PubMed ID: 35530916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparative evaluation of three noninvasive gingival displacement systems: An
    Thimmappa M; Bhatia M; Somani P; Kumar DRV
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(2):122-130. PubMed ID: 29692565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Relationships Between Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses and Restorations and the Periodontium.
    Ercoli C; Tarnow D; Poggio CE; Tsigarida A; Ferrari M; Caton JG; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(4):305-317. PubMed ID: 33210761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of Gingival Retraction Materials Using a New Gingival Sulcus Model.
    Dederichs M; Fahmy MD; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Aug; 28(7):784-789. PubMed ID: 31206914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of retraction materials on gingival health: A histopathological study.
    Phatale S; Marawar PP; Byakod G; Lagdive SB; Kalburge JV
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 14(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 20922077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Estimation of cytokine levels in gingival crevicular fluid following the use of different gingival retraction systems in patients requiring fixed partial dentures - An original research.
    Mathew L; Mathew A; Saranya SK; Mohan AS
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(5):709-712. PubMed ID: 36092456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effectiveness of decoronation technique in the treatment of ankylosis: A systematic review.
    Mohadeb JV; Somar M; He H
    Dent Traumatol; 2016 Aug; 32(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 26663218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Gingival Retraction Using Polyvinyl Siloxane Foam Retraction System, Vinyl Polysiloxane Paste Retraction System, and Copper Wire Reinforced Retraction Cord in Endodontically Treated Teeth: An
    Mehta S; Virani H; Memon S; Nirmal N
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(3):428-432. PubMed ID: 32308315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparative clinical efficacy evaluation of three gingival displacement systems.
    Shrivastava KJ; Bhoyar A; Agarwal S; Shrivastava S; Parlani S; Murthy V
    J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2015 Aug; 6(Suppl 1):S53-7. PubMed ID: 26604620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evidence for use of intraoral scanners under clinical conditions for obtaining full-arch digital impressions is insufficient.
    Khraishi H; Duane B
    Evid Based Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):24-25. PubMed ID: 28338024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effectiveness of intentional replantation in managing teeth with apical periodontitis: A systematic review.
    Plotino G; Abella Sans F; Bastos JV; Nagendrababu V
    Int Endod J; 2023 Oct; 56 Suppl 3():499-509. PubMed ID: 35294790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Correlation of pressure and displacement during gingival displacement: An in vitro study.
    Bennani V; Aarts JM; Schumayer D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 26548889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.
    Gajbhiye V; Banerjee R; Jaiswal P; Chandak A; Radke U
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 31040552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Gingival Retraction using Polyvinyl Acetate Strips and Conventional Retraction Cord - An in Vivo Study.
    Shivasakthy M; Asharaf Ali S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2013 Oct; 7(10):2368-71. PubMed ID: 24298531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Oral health literacy, oral health behaviours and dental outcomes.
    Burns J; McGoldrick N; Muir M
    Evid Based Dent; 2018 Oct; 19(3):69-70. PubMed ID: 30361659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.