156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28338471)
1. Generalized PSF modeling for optimized quantitation in PET imaging.
Ashrafinia S; Mohy-Ud-Din H; Karakatsanis NA; Jha AK; Casey ME; Kadrmas DJ; Rahmim A
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(12):5149-5179. PubMed ID: 28338471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging.
Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of quantitative, efficient image reconstruction for VersaPET, a compact PET system.
Wei S; Vaska P
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2852-2868. PubMed ID: 32219853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The edge artifact in the point-spread function-based PET reconstruction at different sphere-to-background ratios of radioactivity.
Kidera D; Kihara K; Akamatsu G; Mikasa S; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Takeshita T; Maebatake A; Miwa K; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 26531181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protocols for Harmonized Quantification and Noise Reduction in Low-Dose Oncologic
Machado MAD; Menezes VO; Namías M; Vieira NS; Queiroz CC; Matheoud R; Alessio AM; Oliveira ML
J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Mar; 47(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 30076252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved image quality in pinhole SPECT by accurate modeling of the point spread function in low magnification systems.
Pino F; Roé N; Aguiar P; Falcon C; Ros D; Pavía J
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):703-14. PubMed ID: 25652484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Practical considerations for image-based PSF and blobs reconstruction in PET.
Stute S; Comtat C
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(11):3849-70. PubMed ID: 23681172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: an experimental evaluation.
Tong S; Alessio AM; Kinahan PE
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1453-73. PubMed ID: 20150683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relative role of motion and PSF compensation in whole-body oncologic PET-MR imaging.
Petibon Y; Huang C; Ouyang J; Reese TG; Li Q; Syrkina A; Chen YL; El Fakhri G
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042503. PubMed ID: 24694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental evaluation and basis function optimization of the spatially variant image-space PSF on the Ingenuity PET/MR scanner.
Kotasidis FA; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):062501. PubMed ID: 24877835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Applications of both time of flight and point spread function in brain PET image reconstruction.
Shao X; Shao X; Wang X; Wang Y
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Apr; 37(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 26637071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Point Spread Function Reconstruction for Integrated 18F-FET PET/MRI in Patients With Glioma: Does It Affect SUVs and Respective Tumor-to-Background Ratios?
Rogasch JMM; Albers J; Steinkrüger FL; Lukas M; Wedel F; Amthauer H; Furth C
Clin Nucl Med; 2019 Apr; 44(4):e280-e285. PubMed ID: 30562198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scanning rats on the high resolution research tomograph (HRRT): a comparison study with a dedicated micro-PET.
Blinder SA; Dinelle K; Sossi V
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5073-83. PubMed ID: 22894433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Harmonizing SUVs in multicentre trials when using different generation PET systems: prospective validation in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Lasnon C; Desmonts C; Quak E; Gervais R; Do P; Dubos-Arvis C; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jul; 40(7):985-96. PubMed ID: 23564036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influences of point-spread function and time-of-flight reconstructions on standardized uptake value of lymph node metastases in FDG-PET.
Akamatsu G; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):226-30. PubMed ID: 24144448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
