136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28338554)
1. Eligibility for Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass: Examination of Epicardial Adipose Tissue Using Computed Tomography.
Dillon KE; Johnson M; Chan IL; Kiaii B
Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(2):121-126. PubMed ID: 28338554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Novel Approach Using Computed Tomography Angiograms to Predict Sternotomy or Complicated Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Robotically Assisted Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass.
Cook RC; Fung AY; Percy ED; Mayo JR
Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(3):207-210. PubMed ID: 29905587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Left anterior small thoracotomy for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.
Reser D; Holubec T; Caliskan E; Guidotti A; Maisano F
Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg; 2015; 2015():. PubMed ID: 26420246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The ECG-gated 4-row multidetector CT of the heart in preoperative imaging minimal invasive coronary artery bypass grafting].
Begemann PG; Arnold M; Detter C; Boehm DH; Ittrich H; Koops A; Reichenspurner H; Adam G; Weber C
Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1084-92. PubMed ID: 16021540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mid-Term Follow-up of Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Is the Early Learning Phase Detrimental?
Rodriguez ML; Lapierre HR; Sohmer B; Glineur D; Ruel M
Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(2):116-120. PubMed ID: 28328569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early clinical and angiographic outcomes after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery.
Halkos ME; Liberman HA; Devireddy C; Walker P; Finn AV; Jaber W; Guyton RA; Puskas JD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 24172691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative 3D-reconstructions of ultrafast-CT images for the planning of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass operation (MIDCAB).
Gulbins H; Reichenspurner H; Becker C; Boehm DH; Knez A; Schmitz C; Bruening R; Haberl R; Reichart B
Heart Surg Forum; 1998; 1(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 11276449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient anatomy predicts operative time in robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery.
Wehman B; Lehr EJ; Lahiji K; Lee JD; Kon ZN; Jeudy J; Griffith BP; Bonatti J
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Oct; 19(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 25002276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive coronary bypass using internal thoracic arteries via a left minithoracotomy: "the Nambiar Technique".
Nambiar P; Mittal C
Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(6):420-6. PubMed ID: 24356432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Comparison between Minimally Invasive Coronary Bypass Grafting Surgery and Conventional Bypass Grafting Surgery in Proximal LAD Lesion.
Ezelsoy M; Caynak B; Bayram M; Oral K; Bayramoglu Z; Sagbas E; Aytekın V; Akpınar B
Heart Surg Forum; 2015 Apr; 18(2):E042-6. PubMed ID: 25924029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anatomy-based eligibility measure for robotic-assisted bypass surgery.
Escoto A; Trejos AL; Patel RV; Goela A; Kiaii B
Innovations (Phila); 2014; 9(5):349-53; discussion 353. PubMed ID: 25238423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early and midterm results of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart.
Gao C; Yang M; Wu Y; Wang G; Xiao C; Zhao Y; Wang J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Oct; 142(4):843-9. PubMed ID: 21388642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors and Outcomes of Sternotomy Conversion and Cardiopulmonary Bypass Assistance in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Rodriguez ML; Lapierre HR; Sohmer B; Ruel JP; Ruel MA
Innovations (Phila); 2016; 11(5):315-320. PubMed ID: 27828807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of the Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Angiographic Patency Study.
Ruel M; Shariff MA; Lapierre H; Goyal N; Dennie C; Sadel SM; Sohmer B; McGinn JT
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 24183338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeat surgery for coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of the left thoracotomy approach.
Harris DG; Coetzee AR; Augustyn JT; Saaiman A
Heart Surg Forum; 2009 Jun; 12(3):E163-7. PubMed ID: 19546070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of sternotomy off-pump coronary artery bypass and minimally invasive technique for isolated single vessel grafting].
Wu Y; Gao CQ; Yang M; Xiao CS; Liu GP
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 92(14):974-6. PubMed ID: 22781571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pain and the Quality of Life Following Robotic Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery.
Ezelsoy M; Oral K; Caynak B; Bayramoglu Z; Akpinar B
Heart Surg Forum; 2016 Aug; 19(4):E165-8. PubMed ID: 27585193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical factors influencing surgical approach selection of robotic-enhanced minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting].
Cheng N; Gao CQ; Yang M; Wu Y
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 51(11):1016-20. PubMed ID: 24444688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of robotic coronary surgery with intraoperative graft angiography and postoperative multislice computed tomography.
Schachner T; Feuchtner GM; Bonatti J; Bonaros N; Oehlinger A; Gassner E; Pachinger O; Friedrich G
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 83(4):1361-7. PubMed ID: 17383340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive port-access coronary artery bypass grafting with early angiographic follow-up: initial clinical experience.
Ribakove GH; Miller JS; Anderson RV; Grossi EA; Applebaum RM; Cutler WM; Buttenheim PM; Baumann FG; Galloway AC; Colvin SB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 May; 115(5):1101-10. PubMed ID: 9605080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
