BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28338711)

  • 1. The effects of age on crash risk associated with driver distraction.
    Guo F; Klauer SG; Fang Y; Hankey JM; Antin JF; Perez MA; Lee SE; Dingus TA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 46(1):258-265. PubMed ID: 28338711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multitasking additional-to-driving: Prevalence, structure, and associated risk in SHRP2 naturalistic driving data.
    Bálint A; Flannagan CAC; Leslie A; Klauer S; Guo F; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 137():105455. PubMed ID: 32036106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the causal effects of cellphone distraction on crash risk using propensity score methods.
    Lu D; Guo F; Li F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105579. PubMed ID: 32480016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of age and secondary task engagement on motor vehicle crashes in a naturalistic setting.
    Calvo JA; Baldwin C; Philips B
    J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():297-302. PubMed ID: 32563405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of naturalistic driving videos of fleet services drivers to estimate driver error and potentially distracting behaviors as risk factors for rear-end versus angle crashes.
    Harland KK; Carney C; McGehee D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 26760293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The driver-level crash risk associated with daily cellphone use and cellphone use while driving.
    Atwood J; Guo F; Fitch G; Dingus TA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():149-154. PubMed ID: 30031295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distracted Driving and Risk of Crash or Near-Crash Involvement Among Older Drivers Using Naturalistic Driving Data With a Case-Crossover Study Design.
    Huisingh C; Owsley C; Levitan EB; Irvin MR; MacLennan P; McGwin G
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2019 Mar; 74(4):550-555. PubMed ID: 29788187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
    Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Huang E; Megariotis J; Prabahar A; Kashem A; Elzarka A; Haber L; MacKinney T; Loeb H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S89-S96. PubMed ID: 29584473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using event-triggered naturalistic data to examine the prevalence of teen driver distractions in rear-end crashes.
    Carney C; Harland KK; McGehee DV
    J Safety Res; 2016 Jun; 57():47-52. PubMed ID: 27178079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How are different sources of distraction associated with at-fault crashes among drivers of different age gender groups?
    Liang OS; Yang CC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106505. PubMed ID: 34844081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining teen driver crashes and the prevalence of distraction: Recent trends, 2007-2015.
    Carney C; Harland KK; McGehee DV
    J Safety Res; 2018 Feb; 64():21-27. PubMed ID: 29636166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Driving impairments and duration of distractions: Assessing crash risk by harnessing microscopic naturalistic driving data.
    Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105733. PubMed ID: 32916552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Road safety and distraction, results from a responsibility case-control study among a sample of road users interviewed at the emergency room.
    Née M; Contrand B; Orriols L; Gil-Jardiné C; Galéra C; Lagarde E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():19-24. PubMed ID: 30300795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Secondary Task Engagement on Adolescents' Driving Performance and Crash Risk.
    Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; McGehee DV; Manser M
    J Adolesc Health; 2015 Jul; 57(1 Suppl):S36-43. PubMed ID: 26112736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How many crashes does cellphone use contribute to? Population attributable risk of cellphone use while driving.
    Guo F; Lu D
    J Safety Res; 2022 Sep; 82():385-391. PubMed ID: 36031268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of driver distraction in tractor-trailers and motorcoach buses.
    Hammond Olson RL; Soccolich SA; Hanowski RJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():10-16. PubMed ID: 29609806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship of Near-Crash/Crash Risk to Time Spent on a Cell Phone While Driving.
    Farmer CM; Klauer SG; McClafferty JA; Guo F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(8):792-800. PubMed ID: 25793747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of executive load on crashes and near-crashes for young versus older drivers.
    Sullivan KA; Guo F; Klauer SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jun; 201():107539. PubMed ID: 38608508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drivers with child passengers: distracted but cautious?
    Maasalo I; Lehtonen E; Summala H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():25-32. PubMed ID: 31233993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.