These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28339285)
1. Is the necrosis/wall ADC ratio useful for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions? Durur-Subasi I; Durur-Karakaya A; Karaman A; Seker M; Demirci E; Alper F Br J Radiol; 2017 May; 90(1073):20160803. PubMed ID: 28339285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is it better to include necrosis in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements? The necrosis/wall ADC ratio to differentiate malignant and benign necrotic lung lesions: Preliminary results. Karaman A; Durur-Subasi I; Alper F; Durur-Karakaya A; Subasi M; Akgun M J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 46(4):1001-1006. PubMed ID: 28152254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of ADC for Non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging. Imamura T; Isomoto I; Sueyoshi E; Yano H; Uga T; Abe K; Hayashi T; Honda S; Yamaguchi T; Uetani M Magn Reson Med Sci; 2010; 9(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 21187691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI. Liu C; Liang C; Liu Z; Zhang S; Huang B Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e782-9. PubMed ID: 24034833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance of the ADC ratio in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions. Zhao J; Guan H; Li M; Gu H; Qin J; Wu X Acta Radiol; 2016 Apr; 57(4):422-9. PubMed ID: 26071495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Role of Combined Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Differentiating Malignant From Benign Breast Lesions Presenting Washout Curve. Tezcan S; Ozturk FU; Uslu N; Akcay EY Can Assoc Radiol J; 2021 Aug; 72(3):460-469. PubMed ID: 32157892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Min Q; Shao K; Zhai L; Liu W; Zhu C; Yuan L; Yang J World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():32. PubMed ID: 25889380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions. Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values. Peters NH; Vincken KL; van den Bosch MA; Luijten PR; Mali WP; Bartels LW J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1100-5. PubMed ID: 20432344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion-weighted imaging with fat suppression using short-tau inversion recovery: Clinical utility for diagnosis of breast lesions. Ouyang Z; Ouyang Y; Zhu M; Lu Y; Zhang Z; Shi J; Li X; Ren G Clin Radiol; 2014 Aug; 69(8):e337-44. PubMed ID: 24837698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the breast: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values of normal breast tissue with benign and malignant breast lesions. Orguc S; Basara I; Coskun T Singapore Med J; 2012 Nov; 53(11):737-43. PubMed ID: 23192501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion-weighted MRI of breast lesions: a prospective clinical investigation of the quantitative imaging biomarker characteristics of reproducibility, repeatability, and diagnostic accuracy. Spick C; Bickel H; Pinker K; Bernathova M; Kapetas P; Woitek R; Clauser P; Polanec SH; Rudas M; Bartsch R; Helbich TH; Baltzer PA NMR Biomed; 2016 Oct; 29(10):1445-53. PubMed ID: 27553252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diffusion weighted imaging for the differentiation of breast tumors: From apparent diffusion coefficient to high order diffusion tensor imaging. Teruel JR; Goa PE; Sjøbakk TE; Østlie A; Fjøsne HE; Bathen TF J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 43(5):1111-21. PubMed ID: 26494124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of breast masses as benign or malignant at 3.0T MRI with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Suo S; Zhang K; Cao M; Suo X; Hua J; Geng X; Chen J; Zhuang Z; Ji X; Lu Q; Wang H; Xu J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 26343918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Çabuk G; Nass Duce M; Özgür A; Apaydın FD; Polat A; Orekici G J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 59(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 25564776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. Partridge SC; Mullins CD; Kurland BF; Allain MD; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Lehman CD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1664-73. PubMed ID: 20489111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of breast tumor tissue selection in diffusion weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Wielema M; Dorrius MD; Pijnappel RM; De Bock GH; Baltzer PAT; Oudkerk M; Sijens PE PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232856. PubMed ID: 32374781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions in diffusion-weighted MRI. Şahin C; Arıbal E Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 24004972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value to evaluate BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: correlation with pathological findings. Ramírez-Galván YA; Cardona-Huerta S; Ibarra-Fombona E; Elizondo-Riojas G Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 25457520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation of benign and malignant lesions of the tongue by using diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T. Li S; Cheng J; Zhang Y; Zhang Z Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(7):20140325. PubMed ID: 25823772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]