These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28339302)

  • 21. Forward collision warning based on a driver model to increase drivers' acceptance.
    Puente Guillen P; Gohl I
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 31381428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simulator training with a forward collision warning system: effects on driver-system interactions and driver trust.
    Koustanaï A; Cavallo V; Delhomme P; Mas A
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):709-21. PubMed ID: 23156617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of collision warning characteristics on driving behaviors and safety in connected vehicle environments.
    Zhao W; Gong S; Zhao D; Liu F; Sze NN; Huang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107053. PubMed ID: 37030178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Field effectiveness of general motors advanced driver assistance and headlighting systems.
    Leslie AJ; Kiefer RJ; Meitzner MR; Flannagan CA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106275. PubMed ID: 34242861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modelling driver acceptance of driver support systems.
    Rahman MM; Strawderman L; Lesch MF; Horrey WJ; Babski-Reeves K; Garrison T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():134-147. PubMed ID: 30245477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of blind spot monitoring systems on police-reported lane-change crashes.
    Cicchino JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(6):615-622. PubMed ID: 29927678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of false warnings on partial and full lane departure warnings effectiveness and acceptance in car driving.
    Navarro J; Yousfi E; Deniel J; Jallais C; Bueno M; Fort A
    Ergonomics; 2016 Dec; 59(12):1553-1564. PubMed ID: 26916010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Valuation of active blind spot detection systems by younger and older adults.
    Souders DJ; Best R; Charness N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():505-514. PubMed ID: 27567729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analyzing the effect of fog weather conditions on driver lane-keeping performance using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study data.
    Das A; Ghasemzadeh A; Ahmed MM
    J Safety Res; 2019 Feb; 68():71-80. PubMed ID: 30876522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adaptive forward collision warning system for hazmat truck drivers: Considering differential driving behavior and risk levels.
    Shao Y; Shi X; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Xu Y; Chen W; Ye Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107221. PubMed ID: 37473523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of single versus multiple warnings on driver performance.
    Cummings ML; Kilgore RM; Wang E; Tijerina L; Kochhar DS
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1097-106. PubMed ID: 18074708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Crash avoidance potential of four large truck technologies.
    Jermakian JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Nov; 49():338-46. PubMed ID: 22763402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lateral control assistance for car drivers: a comparison of motor priming and warning systems.
    Navarro J; Mars F; Hoc JM
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):950-60. PubMed ID: 17915609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Haptic Lane-Keeping Assistance for Truck Driving: A Test Track Study.
    Roozendaal J; Johansson E; Winter J; Abbink D; Petermeijer S
    Hum Factors; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1380-1395. PubMed ID: 32551951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Residual road departure crashes after full deployment of LDW and LDP systems.
    Riexinger LE; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S177-S181. PubMed ID: 31381442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluate driver response to active warning system in level-2 automated vehicles.
    Atwood JR; Guo F; Blanco M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():132-138. PubMed ID: 31005004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Net-societal and net-private benefits of some existing vehicle crash avoidance technologies.
    Khan A; Harper CD; Hendrickson CT; Samaras C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():207-216. PubMed ID: 30772676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.