These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28339302)

  • 41. The effects of warning characteristics on driver behavior in connected vehicles systems with missed warnings.
    Zhang Y; Wu C; Qiao C; Hou Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():138-145. PubMed ID: 30639686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Lane change warning threshold based on driver perception characteristics.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Fu R; Li Z; Zhang Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():164-174. PubMed ID: 29704793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Drivers' eye movements as a function of collision avoidance warning conditions in red light running scenarios.
    Zhang Y; Yan X; Li X; Xue Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():185-197. PubMed ID: 27543896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An evaluation of the real-world safety effect of a lane change driver support system and characteristics of lane change crashes based on insurance claims data.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S104-S111. PubMed ID: 29584482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Aging: Older Adults' Driving Behavior Using Longitudinal and Lateral Warning Systems.
    Souders DJ; Charness N; Roque NA; Pham H
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):229-248. PubMed ID: 31361158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Advanced driver assistance systems for teen drivers: A national survey of teen and parent perceptions.
    Hannan C; Palumbo AJ; Fisher Thiel MC; Weiss E; Seacrist T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S84-S90. PubMed ID: 30335514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Detection of emergency vehicles: driver responses to advance warning in a driving simulator.
    Lenné MG; Triggs TJ; Mulvihill CM; Regan MA; Corben BF
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 18354977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
    Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings--a naturalistic driving study.
    Wege C; Will S; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():259-70. PubMed ID: 23068426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: Sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses.
    Morando A; Victor T; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():206-219. PubMed ID: 27658227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Adverse Behavioral Adaptation to Adaptive Forward Collision Warning Systems: An Investigation of Primary and Secondary Task Performance.
    Reinmueller K; Kiesel A; Steinhauser M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105718. PubMed ID: 32847736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. How does a collision warning system shape driver's brake response time? The influence of expectancy and automation complacency on real-life emergency braking.
    Ruscio D; Ciceri MR; Biassoni F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Apr; 77():72-81. PubMed ID: 25700125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cost and benefit estimates of partially-automated vehicle collision avoidance technologies.
    Harper CD; Hendrickson CT; Samaras C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):104-15. PubMed ID: 27423430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. In-vehicle warnings for work zone and related rear-end collisions: A driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106768. PubMed ID: 35820314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The safety potential of lane departure warning systems-A descriptive real-world study of fatal lane departure passenger car crashes in Sweden.
    Sternlund S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S18-S23. PubMed ID: 28394639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluating driver drowsiness countermeasures.
    Gaspar JG; Brown TL; Schwarz CW; Lee JD; Kang J; Higgins JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S58-S63. PubMed ID: 28323444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Buick Lucerne drivers' experiences with rear parking sensors.
    Cicchino JB; Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 24874650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Distracting behaviors among teenagers and young, middle-aged, and older adult drivers when driving without and with warnings from an integrated vehicle safety system.
    Kidd DG; Buonarosa ML
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():177-185. PubMed ID: 28454863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Volvo and Infiniti drivers' experiences with select crash avoidance technologies.
    Braitman KA; McCartt AT; Zuby DS; Singer J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2010 Jun; 11(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 20544571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A Vision-Based Driver Assistance System with Forward Collision and Overtaking Detection.
    Lin HY; Dai JM; Wu LT; Chen LQ
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Sep; 20(18):. PubMed ID: 32916970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.