These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28339510)

  • 1. 3D dentofacial photogrammetry reference values: a novel approach to orthodontic diagnosis.
    Masoud MI; Bansal N; C Castillo J; Manosudprasit A; Allareddy V; Haghi A; Hawkins HC; Otárola-Castillo E
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Apr; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28339510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Stabilized position of incisors after orthodontic treatment on reversed occlusion cases with skeletal imbalance. Application of quadrilateral analysis].
    Morita S; Ishii H; Egami K; Ogura H; Kasai K; Seki H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 48(3):344-54. PubMed ID: 2637321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between 3D dentofacial photogrammetry measurements and traditional cephalometric measurements.
    Castillo JC; Gianneschi G; Azer D; Manosudprasit A; Haghi A; Bansal N; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):275-283. PubMed ID: 30779676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment.
    Ko EW; Hsu SS; Hsieh HY; Wang YC; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1469-77. PubMed ID: 21256648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements.
    Anić-Milosević S; Lapter-Varga M; Slaj M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18263886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional analysis of the change in the curvature of the smiling line following orthodontic treatment in incisor class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Mah M; Tan WC; Ong SH; Chan YH; Foong K
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 36(6):657-64. PubMed ID: 23771899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue facial profile of Indian adults.
    Pandian KS; Krishnan S; Kumar SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 29652003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in anteroposterior position and inclination of the maxillary incisors after surgical-orthodontic treatment of skeletal class III malocclusions.
    Zou B; Zhou Y; Lowe AA; Li H; Pliska B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):1986-93. PubMed ID: 26439521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anthropometric Study of Three-Dimensional Facial Morphology in Malay Adults.
    Othman SA; Majawit LP; Wan Hassan WN; Wey MC; Mohd Razi R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164180. PubMed ID: 27706220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.
    Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N
    J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients.
    Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlations between objective measurements and subjective evaluations of facial profile after orthodontic treatment.
    He D; Gu Y; Sun Y
    J Int Med Res; 2020 Jul; 48(7):300060520936854. PubMed ID: 32644827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size.
    Normando D; da Silva PL; Mendes ÁM
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 21282283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion and orthodontic treatment. Effects on dental, skeletal and nasal structures and rhinological findings.
    Magnusson A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2013; (229):1-104. PubMed ID: 23964483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A cephalometric comparison of maxillary and mandibular incisor teeth position and soft tissue profile].
    Seren E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 2101665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.