These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28339860)

  • 1. Outcomes with single-coil versus dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a meta-analysis.
    Sunderland N; Kaura A; Murgatroyd F; Dhillon P; Scott PA
    Europace; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e21-e29. PubMed ID: 28339860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of single- vs dual-coil implantable defibrillator leads: An observational analysis from the SIMPLE study.
    Neuzner J; Hohnloser SH; Kutyifa V; Glikson M; Dietze T; Mabo P; Vinolas X; Kautzner J; O'Hara G; Lawo T; Brachmann J; VanErven L; Gadler F; Appl U; Wang J; Connolly SJ; Healey JS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Jul; 30(7):1078-1085. PubMed ID: 30945798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contemporary rates and outcomes of single- vs. dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead implantation: data from the Israeli ICD Registry.
    Leshem E; Suleiman M; Laish-Farkash A; Konstantino Y; Glikson M; Barsheshet A; Goldenberg I; Michowitz Y;
    Europace; 2017 Sep; 19(9):1485-1492. PubMed ID: 27702848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-coil and dual-coil defibrillator leads and association with clinical outcomes in a complete Danish nationwide ICD cohort.
    Larsen JM; Hjortshøj SP; Nielsen JC; Johansen JB; Petersen HH; Haarbo J; Johansen MB; Thøgersen AM
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Mar; 13(3):706-12. PubMed ID: 26593333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Single-Coil and Dual-Coil Implantable Defibrillators: A Meta-Analysis.
    Kumar P; Baker M; Gehi AK
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Jan; 3(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 29759689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical impact, safety, and efficacy of single- versus dual-coil ICD leads in MADIT-CRT.
    Kutyifa V; Huth Ruwald AC; Aktas MK; Jons C; McNitt S; Polonsky B; Geller L; Merkely B; Moss AJ; Zareba W; Bloch Thomsen PE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1246-52. PubMed ID: 23889863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No benefit of a dual coil over a single coil ICD lead: evidence from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial.
    Aoukar PS; Poole JE; Johnson GW; Anderson J; Hellkamp AS; Mark DB; Lee KL; Bardy GH
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Jul; 10(7):970-6. PubMed ID: 23562699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators for Primary Prevention of Mortality in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Stavrakis S; Asad Z; Reynolds D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Jun; 28(6):659-665. PubMed ID: 28316104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should Single-Coil Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads Be Used in all Patients?
    Almehmadi F; Manlucu J
    Card Electrophysiol Clin; 2018 Mar; 10(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 29428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utilization trends and clinical outcomes in patients implanted with a single- vs a dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: Insights from the ALTITUDE Study.
    Hsu JC; Saxon LA; Jones PW; Wehrenberg S; Marcus GM
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Aug; 12(8):1770-5. PubMed ID: 25916569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of programming strategies aimed at reducing nonessential implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tan VH; Wilton SB; Kuriachan V; Sumner GL; Exner DV
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 7(1):164-70. PubMed ID: 24446023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in primary prevention of total mortality in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy: results from a meta-analysis of prospective randomized clinical trials.
    Romero J; Díaz JC; Grushko M; Quispe R; Briceno D; Avendano R; Golive A; Pina I; Natale A; Garcia MJ; Jorde UP; Di Biase L
    Europace; 2018 Sep; 20(FI2):f211-f216. PubMed ID: 29161424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in paediatric practice: a single-centre UK experience with focus on subcutaneous defibrillation.
    Griksaitis MJ; Rosengarten JA; Gnanapragasam JP; Haw MP; Morgan JM
    Europace; 2013 Apr; 15(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 23333943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Apical versus Non-Apical Lead: Is ICD Lead Position Important for Successful Defibrillation?
    Amit G; Wang J; Connolly SJ; Glikson M; Hohnloser S; Wright DJ; Brachmann J; Defaye P; Neuzner J; Mabo P; Vanerven L; Vinolas X; O'Hara G; Kautzner J; Appl U; Gadler F; Stein K; Konstantino Y; Healey JS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 May; 27(5):581-6. PubMed ID: 26888558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shock efficacy of single and dual coil electrodes-new insights from the NORDIC ICD Trial.
    Bänsch D; Bonnemeier H; Brandt J; Bode F; Svendsen JH; Ritter O; Aring J; Gutleben KJ; Schneider R; Felk A; Hauser T; Buchholz A; Hindricks G; Wegscheider K
    Europace; 2018 Jun; 20(6):971-978. PubMed ID: 28419217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Outcomes of Single- versus Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Lessons from the Israeli ICD Registry.
    Konstantino Y; Haim M; Boxer J; Goldenberg I; Feldman A; Michowitz Y; Glikson M; Suleiman M;
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):718-23. PubMed ID: 26852908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multicentre comparison Of shock efficacy using single-vs. Dual-coil lead systems and Anodal vs. cathodaL polarITY defibrillation in patients undergoing transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The MODALITY study.
    Baccillieri MS; Gasparini G; Benacchio L; Zorzi A; Marras E; Zerbo F; Tomasi L; Vaccari D; Pastore G; Bonanno C; Molon G; Zanotto G; Fusco A; Carasi M; Zorzi A; Calzolari V; Ignatiuk B; Cannas S; Vaglio A; Al Bunni M; Pedrini A; Olivieri A; Rampazzo R; Minicuci N; Corrado D; Verlato R
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jun; 43(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 25690336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with CKD: a propensity-matched mortality analysis.
    Nakhoul GN; Schold JD; Arrigain S; Harb SC; Jolly S; Wilkoff BL; Nally JV; Navaneethan SD
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2015 Jul; 10(7):1119-27. PubMed ID: 26111859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics and early clinical outcomes of patients undergoing totally subcutaneous vs. transvenous single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement.
    Mithani AA; Kath H; Hunter K; Andriulli J; Ortman M; Field J; Russo AM
    Europace; 2018 Feb; 20(2):308-314. PubMed ID: 28383717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator compared to dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator: less is more! Data from the German Device Registry.
    Bogossian H; Frommeyer G; Hochadel M; Ince H; Spitzer SG; Eckardt L; Maier SKG; Kleemann T; Brachmann J; Stellbrink C; Gonska BD; Kääb S; Senges J; Lemke B
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2020 Jul; 109(7):911-917. PubMed ID: 31823040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.