These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28340274)

  • 1. Regularized quantile regression applied to genome-enabled prediction of quantitative traits.
    Nascimento M; E Silva FF; de Resende MD; Cruz CD; Nascimento AC; Viana JM; Azevedo CF; Barroso LM
    Genet Mol Res; 2017 Mar; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 28340274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantile regression in genomic selection for oligogenic traits in autogamous plants: A simulation study.
    Oliveira GF; Nascimento ACC; Nascimento M; Sant'Anna IC; Romero JV; Azevedo CF; Bhering LL; Moura ETC
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0243666. PubMed ID: 33400704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
    Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of marker density and population structure on the genomic prediction accuracy for growth trait in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei.
    Wang Q; Yu Y; Yuan J; Zhang X; Huang H; Li F; Xiang J
    BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):45. PubMed ID: 28514941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regularized quantile regression for SNP marker estimation of pig growth curves.
    Barroso LMA; Nascimento M; Nascimento ACC; Silva FF; Serão NVL; Cruz CD; Resende MDV; Silva FL; Azevedo CF; Lopes PS; Guimarães SEF
    J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2017; 8():59. PubMed ID: 28702191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identity-by-descent genomic selection using selective and sparse genotyping for binary traits.
    Ødegård J; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):8. PubMed ID: 25888522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees.
    Waldmann P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):42. PubMed ID: 27286957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between genomic predictions using daughter yield deviation and conventional estimated breeding value as response variables.
    Guo G; Lund MS; Zhang Y; Su G
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Dec; 127(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 21077966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breeding value estimation for fat percentage using dense markers on Bos taurus autosome 14.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Mullaart E; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4821-9. PubMed ID: 17881705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of genomic selection methods for predicting fiber quality traits in Upland cotton.
    Islam MS; Fang DD; Jenkins JN; Guo J; McCarty JC; Jones DC
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2020 Jan; 295(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 31473809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.