These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28340274)

  • 21. The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Villumsen TM; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Feb; 126(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 19207924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Approximated prediction of genomic selection accuracy when reference and candidate populations are related.
    Elsen JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():18. PubMed ID: 26940536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Multiple-Trait Bayesian Lasso for Genome-Enabled Analysis and Prediction of Complex Traits.
    Gianola D; Fernando RL
    Genetics; 2020 Feb; 214(2):305-331. PubMed ID: 31879318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
    Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bias in estimates of variance components in populations undergoing genomic selection: a simulation study.
    Gao H; Madsen P; Aamand GP; Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC; Jensen J
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):956. PubMed ID: 31818251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle.
    Mujibi FD; Nkrumah JD; Durunna ON; Stothard P; Mah J; Wang Z; Basarab J; Plastow G; Crews DH; Moore SS
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3353-61. PubMed ID: 21642493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sensitivity to prior specification in Bayesian genome-based prediction models.
    Lehermeier C; Wimmer V; Albrecht T; Auinger HJ; Gianola D; Schmid VJ; Schön CC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Jun; 12(3):375-91. PubMed ID: 23629460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance of Bayesian and BLUP alphabets for genomic prediction: analysis, comparison and results.
    Meher PK; Rustgi S; Kumar A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Jun; 128(6):519-530. PubMed ID: 35508540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors affecting GEBV accuracy with single-step Bayesian models.
    Zhou L; Mrode R; Zhang S; Zhang Q; Li B; Liu JF
    Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Jan; 120(2):100-109. PubMed ID: 29167557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exploring the areas of applicability of whole-genome prediction methods for Asian rice (Oryza sativa L.).
    Onogi A; Ideta O; Inoshita Y; Ebana K; Yoshioka T; Yamasaki M; Iwata H
    Theor Appl Genet; 2015 Jan; 128(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 25341369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genomic prediction of breeding values for carcass traits in Nellore cattle.
    Fernandes Júnior GA; Rosa GJ; Valente BD; Carvalheiro R; Baldi F; Garcia DA; Gordo DG; Espigolan R; Takada L; Tonussi RL; de Andrade WB; Magalhães AF; Chardulo LA; Tonhati H; de Albuquerque LG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():7. PubMed ID: 26830208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genomic selection of seed weight based on low-density SCAR markers in soybean.
    Shu YJ; Yu DS; Wang D; Bai X; Zhu YM; Guo CH
    Genet Mol Res; 2013 Jul; 12(3):2178-88. PubMed ID: 23884761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Comparative Study of Single-Trait and Multi-Trait Genomic Selection.
    Budhlakoti N; Mishra DC; Rai A; Lal SB; Chaturvedi KK; Kumar RR
    J Comput Biol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1100-1112. PubMed ID: 30994361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. High density marker panels, SNPs prioritizing and accuracy of genomic selection.
    Chang LY; Toghiani S; Ling A; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
    BMC Genet; 2018 Jan; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 29304753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance of pedigree and various forms of marker-derived relationship coefficients in genomic prediction and their correlations.
    Solaymani S; Ayatollahi Mehrgardi A; Esmailizadeh A; Tusell L; Momen M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Sep; 137(5):423-437. PubMed ID: 32003127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Bayesian method and its variational approximation for prediction of genomic breeding values in multiple traits.
    Hayashi T; Iwata H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Jan; 14():34. PubMed ID: 23363272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.