241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28340624)
1. MeDeCom: discovery and quantification of latent components of heterogeneous methylomes.
Lutsik P; Slawski M; Gasparoni G; Vedeneev N; Hein M; Walter J
Genome Biol; 2017 Mar; 18(1):55. PubMed ID: 28340624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reference-free deconvolution, visualization and interpretation of complex DNA methylation data using DecompPipeline, MeDeCom and FactorViz.
Scherer M; Nazarov PV; Toth R; Sahay S; Kaoma T; Maurer V; Vedeneev N; Plass C; Lengauer T; Walter J; Lutsik P
Nat Protoc; 2020 Oct; 15(10):3240-3263. PubMed ID: 32978601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guidelines for cell-type heterogeneity quantification based on a comparative analysis of reference-free DNA methylation deconvolution software.
Decamps C; Privé F; Bacher R; Jost D; Waguet A; ; Houseman EA; Lurie E; Lutsik P; Milosavljevic A; Scherer M; Blum MGB; Richard M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):16. PubMed ID: 31931698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computational Methods for Single-cell DNA Methylome Analysis.
Iqbal W; Zhou W
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2023 Feb; 21(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 35718270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FASTmC: A Suite of Predictive Models for Nonreference-Based Estimations of DNA Methylation.
Bewick AJ; Hofmeister BT; Lee K; Zhang X; Hall DW; Schmitz RJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Dec; 6(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 26681520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extracting a biologically latent space of lung cancer epigenetics with variational autoencoders.
Wang Z; Wang Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 20(Suppl 18):568. PubMed ID: 31760935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A method of sample-wise region-set enrichment analysis for DNA methylomics.
Minegishi R; Gotoh O; Tanaka N; Maruyama R; Chang JT; Mori S
Epigenomics; 2021 Jul; 13(14):1081-1093. PubMed ID: 34241544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. scMET: Bayesian modeling of DNA methylation heterogeneity at single-cell resolution.
Kapourani CA; Argelaguet R; Sanguinetti G; Vallejos CA
Genome Biol; 2021 Apr; 22(1):114. PubMed ID: 33879195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reference-free deconvolution of DNA methylation data and mediation by cell composition effects.
Houseman EA; Kile ML; Christiani DC; Ince TA; Kelsey KT; Marsit CJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 17():259. PubMed ID: 27358049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of genotype and in utero environment on interindividual variation in neonate DNA methylomes.
Teh AL; Pan H; Chen L; Ong ML; Dogra S; Wong J; MacIsaac JL; Mah SM; McEwen LM; Saw SM; Godfrey KM; Chong YS; Kwek K; Kwoh CK; Soh SE; Chong MF; Barton S; Karnani N; Cheong CY; Buschdorf JP; Stünkel W; Kobor MS; Meaney MJ; Gluckman PD; Holbrook JD
Genome Res; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1064-74. PubMed ID: 24709820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic evaluation of cell-type deconvolution pipelines for sequencing-based bulk DNA methylomes.
Jeong Y; de Andrade E Sousa LB; Thalmeier D; Toth R; Ganslmeier M; Breuer K; Plass C; Lutsik P
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Jul; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 35794707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mining cancer methylomes: prospects and challenges.
Stirzaker C; Taberlay PC; Statham AL; Clark SJ
Trends Genet; 2014 Feb; 30(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 24368016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Next generation sequencing in epigenetics: insights and challenges.
Meaburn E; Schulz R
Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2012 Apr; 23(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 22027613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tools and Strategies for Analysis of Genome-Wide and Gene-Specific DNA Methylation Patterns.
Chatterjee A; Rodger EJ; Morison IM; Eccles MR; Stockwell PA
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1537():249-277. PubMed ID: 27924599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic identification and annotation of human methylation marks based on bisulfite sequencing methylomes reveals distinct roles of cell type-specific hypomethylation in the regulation of cell identity genes.
Liu H; Liu X; Zhang S; Lv J; Li S; Shang S; Jia S; Wei Y; Wang F; Su J; Wu Q; Zhang Y
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jan; 44(1):75-94. PubMed ID: 26635396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrative computational epigenomics to build data-driven gene regulation hypotheses.
Chen T; Tyagi S
Gigascience; 2020 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32543653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CandiMeth: Powerful yet simple visualization and quantification of DNA methylation at candidate genes.
Thursby SJ; Lobo DK; Pentieva K; Zhang SD; Irwin RE; Walsh CP
Gigascience; 2020 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32568373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genome-wide DNA methylome variation in two genetically distinct chicken lines using MethylC-seq.
Li J; Li R; Wang Y; Hu X; Zhao Y; Li L; Feng C; Gu X; Liang F; Lamont SJ; Hu S; Zhou H; Li N
BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():851. PubMed ID: 26497311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-specificity bioinformatics framework for epigenomic profiling of discordant twins reveals specific and shared markers for ACPA and ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis.
Gomez-Cabrero D; Almgren M; Sjöholm LK; Hensvold AH; Ringh MV; Tryggvadottir R; Kere J; Scheynius A; Acevedo N; Reinius L; Taub MA; Montano C; Aryee MJ; Feinberg JI; Feinberg AP; Tegnér J; Klareskog L; Catrina AI; Ekström TJ
Genome Med; 2016 Nov; 8(1):124. PubMed ID: 27876072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtual methylome dissection facilitated by single-cell analyses.
Yin L; Luo Y; Xu X; Wen S; Wu X; Lu X; Xie H
Epigenetics Chromatin; 2019 Nov; 12(1):66. PubMed ID: 31711526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
