These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28341312)

  • 21. The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited: Occlusion Distance as a Function of Task-Relevant Event Density in Realistic Driving Scenarios.
    Kujala T; Mäkelä J; Kotilainen I; Tokkonen T
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 26238120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.
    Haque MM; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():42-53. PubMed ID: 24129320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can variations in visual behavior measures be good predictors of driver sleepiness? A real driving test study.
    Wang Y; Xin M; Bai H; Zhao Y
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Feb; 18(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 27763776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gaze and Eye Tracking: Techniques and Applications in ADAS.
    Khan MQ; Lee S
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 31847432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Review of Occlusion as a Tool to Assess Attentional Demand in Driving.
    Kujala T; Kircher K; Ahlström C
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):792-808. PubMed ID: 33908809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of button location on driver's visual behaviour and safety perception.
    Dukic T; Hanson L; Holmqvist K; Wartenberg C
    Ergonomics; 2005 Mar; 48(4):399-410. PubMed ID: 15804848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamic Visual Measurement of Driver Eye Movements.
    Zhang J; Yang Z; Deng H; Yu H; Ma M; Zhong X
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 May; 19(10):. PubMed ID: 31091679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Audiovisual presentation of variable message signs improves message processing in distracted drivers during partially automated driving.
    Pi-Ruano M; Roca J; Tejero P
    J Safety Res; 2024 Jun; 89():172-180. PubMed ID: 38858040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Research on safety evaluation model for in-vehicle secondary task driving.
    Jin L; Xian H; Niu Q; Bie J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():243-50. PubMed ID: 25194987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Driver distraction and its effects on partially automated driving performance: A driving simulator study among young-experienced drivers.
    Zangi N; Srour-Zreik R; Ridel D; Chasidim H; Borowsky A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106565. PubMed ID: 35032704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attention allocation patterns in naturalistic driving.
    Wong JT; Huang SH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():140-7. PubMed ID: 23743253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Virtual testing of speed reduction schemes on urban collector roads.
    Domenichini L; Branzi V; Meocci M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():38-51. PubMed ID: 29101788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Examination of Driver Visual and Cognitive Responses to Billboard Elicited Passive Distraction Using Eye-Fixation Related Potential.
    Wang Y; Clifford W; Markham C; Deegan C
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33672488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the Difference Between Necessary and Unnecessary Glances Away From the Forward Roadway: An Occlusion Study on the Motorway.
    Kircher K; Kujala T; Ahlström C
    Hum Factors; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1117-1131. PubMed ID: 31403323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
    Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers' visual behavior and braking performance.
    Harbluk JL; Noy YI; Trbovich PL; Eizenman M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Mar; 39(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 17054894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of momentary visual disruption on hazard anticipation and awareness in driving.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 24697569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of eye-tracking in the testing of drivers: A review of research.
    Kapitaniak B; Walczak M; Kosobudzki M; Jóźwiak Z; Bortkiewicz A
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2015; 28(6):941-54. PubMed ID: 26294197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.