These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28341647)

  • 1. Estimating Seven Coefficients of Pairwise Relatedness Using Population-Genomic Data.
    Ackerman MS; Johri P; Spitze K; Xu S; Doak TG; Young K; Lynch M
    Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 28341647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: the effect of demographic history.
    Robinson SP; Simmons LW; Kennington WJ
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(23):5779-92. PubMed ID: 24102888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating Genetic Relatedness in Admixed Populations.
    Sethuraman A
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Oct; 8(10):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 30104261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-identifiability of identity coefficients at biallelic loci.
    Csűrös M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Mar; 92():22-9. PubMed ID: 24269334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Jan; 11(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 21429111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular and pedigree measures of relatedness provide similar estimates of inbreeding depression in a bottlenecked population.
    Townsend SM; Jamieson IG
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):889-99. PubMed ID: 23496652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs.
    Santure AW; Stapley J; Ball AD; Birkhead TR; Burke T; Slate J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(7):1439-51. PubMed ID: 20149098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness.
    Wang J
    Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):135-53. PubMed ID: 17894908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-gene identity coefficients demonstrate that clonal reproduction promotes inbreeding and spatial relatedness in yellow-cedar, Callitropsis nootkatensis.
    Thompson SL; Bérubé Y; Bruneau A; Ritland K
    Evolution; 2008 Oct; 62(10):2570-9. PubMed ID: 18647338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic Variation of Inbreeding and Ancestry in the Remaining Two Isle Royale Wolves.
    Hedrick PW; Kardos M; Peterson RO; Vucetich JA
    J Hered; 2017 Mar; 108(2):120-126. PubMed ID: 27940471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the correlation of pairwise relatedness along chromosomes.
    Hu XS
    Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Mar; 94(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 15354191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.
    Eynard SE; Windig JJ; Leroy G; van Binsbergen R; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Mar; 16():24. PubMed ID: 25887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The coefficient of dominance is not (always) estimable with biallelic markers.
    García-Cortés LA; Legarra A; Toro MA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Apr; 131(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 24397385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds.
    Zhang Q; Calus MP; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sahana G
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 26195126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence of opposing fitness effects of parental heterozygosity and relatedness in a critically endangered marine turtle?
    Phillips KP; Jorgensen TH; Jolliffe KG; Richardson DS
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Nov; 30(11):1953-1965. PubMed ID: 28787533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic Inbreeding and Relatedness in Wild Panda Populations.
    Garbe JR; Prakapenka D; Tan C; Da Y
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160496. PubMed ID: 27494031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genotypic selection in Daphnia populations consisting of inbred sibships.
    Haag CR; Ebert D
    J Evol Biol; 2007 May; 20(3):881-91. PubMed ID: 17465899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs.
    Oliehoek PA; Windig JJ; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    Genetics; 2006 May; 173(1):483-96. PubMed ID: 16510792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unexpected relationships and inbreeding in HapMap phase III populations.
    Stevens EL; Baugher JD; Shirley MD; Frelin LP; Pevsner J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49575. PubMed ID: 23185369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.