BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28342125)

  • 1. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
    Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for recurrences after previous piecemeal resection of colorectal polyps (with video).
    Kim HG; Thosani N; Banerjee S; Chen A; Friedland S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1094-102. PubMed ID: 25012560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Sessile or Flat Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Goelder SK; Roemmele C; Neuhaus L; Weber T; Braun G; Probst A; Schnoy E; Kafel AJ; Muzalyova A; Messmann H
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Nov; 161(5):1460-1474.e1. PubMed ID: 34371000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Underwater colorectal EMR: remodeling endoscopic mucosal resection.
    Curcio G; Granata A; Ligresti D; Tarantino I; Barresi L; Liotta R; Traina M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 May; 81(5):1238-42. PubMed ID: 25746979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility and outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥ 10 mm colorectal polyps.
    Siau K; Ishaq S; Cadoni S; Kuwai T; Yusuf A; Suzuki N
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2656-2663. PubMed ID: 29101560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Underwater" EMR without submucosal injection for large sessile colorectal polyps (with video).
    Binmoeller KF; Weilert F; Shah J; Bhat Y; Kane S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 May; 75(5):1086-91. PubMed ID: 22365184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps.
    Yamashina T; Uedo N; Akasaka T; Iwatsubo T; Nakatani Y; Akamatsu T; Kawamura T; Takeuchi Y; Fujii S; Kusaka T; Shimokawa T
    Gastroenterology; 2019 Aug; 157(2):451-461.e2. PubMed ID: 30981791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.
    Nett A; Binmoeller K
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2019 Oct; 29(4):659-673. PubMed ID: 31445689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial : (UEMR vs. CEMR for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps).
    Zhang Z; Xia Y; Cui H; Yuan X; Wang C; Xie J; Tong Y; Wang W; Xu L
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):311. PubMed ID: 32967616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection without submucosal injection (UEMR) for large colorectal polyps: A community-based series.
    Barclay RL; Percy DB
    Am J Surg; 2020 Sep; 220(3):693-696. PubMed ID: 32061399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for 20-30 mm colorectal polyps.
    Inoue T; Nakagawa K; Yamasaki Y; Shichijo S; Kanesaka T; Maekawa A; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Takeuchi Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2549-2557. PubMed ID: 33724540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hot snare polypectomy with or without saline solution/epinephrine lift for the complete resection of small colorectal polyps.
    Kim HS; Jung HY; Park HJ; Kim HM; Seong JH; Kang YS; Cho MY; Yu MH; Kang DR
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jun; 87(6):1539-1547. PubMed ID: 29409923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sundaram S; Seth V; Jearth V; Giri S
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):225-233. PubMed ID: 36148677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Underwater
    Ni DQ; Lu YP; Liu XQ; Gao LY; Huang X
    World J Clin Cases; 2020 Oct; 8(20):4826-4837. PubMed ID: 33195650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal neoplasia is easily learned, efficacious, and safe.
    Wang AY; Flynn MM; Patrie JT; Cox DG; Bleibel W; Mann JA; Sauer BG; Shami VM
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Apr; 28(4):1348-54. PubMed ID: 24232051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10 mm sessile or flat colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang X; Wang Y; Cao X; Zhang C; Miao L
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0299931. PubMed ID: 38451998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.
    Buchner AM; Guarner-Argente C; Ginsberg GG
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 22657404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10-mm colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li DF; Lai MG; Yang MF; Zou ZY; Xu J; Peng RM; Xiong F; Wei C; Zhang DG; Xu ZL; Wang LS; Yao J
    Endoscopy; 2021 Jun; 53(6):636-646. PubMed ID: 32767283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Underwater versus conventional EMR for colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Choi AY; Moosvi Z; Shah S; Roccato MK; Wang AY; Hamerski CM; Samarasena JB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Feb; 93(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 33068608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Underwater versus conventional EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a randomized clinical trial.
    Lenz L; Martins B; Andrade de Paulo G; Kawaguti FS; Baba ER; Uemura RS; Gusmon CC; Geiger SN; Moura RN; Pennacchi C; Simas de Lima M; Safatle-Ribeiro AV; Hashimoto CL; Ribeiro U; Maluf-Filho F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Mar; 97(3):549-558. PubMed ID: 36309072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 69.