These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28343260)

  • 1. Urethral lumen occlusion by artificial sphincteric devices: a computational biomechanics approach.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Fontanella CG; Todros S; De Benedictis GM; Cerruto MA; Artibani W
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Aug; 16(4):1439-1446. PubMed ID: 28343260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urethral lumen occlusion by artificial sphincteric device: Evaluation of degraded tissues effects.
    Natali AN; Fontanella CG; Todros S; Carniel EL
    J Biomech; 2017 Dec; 65():75-81. PubMed ID: 29042057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanics of the urethral duct: tissue constitutive formulation and structural modeling for the investigation of lumen occlusion.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Fontanella CG; Frigo A; Todros S; Rubini A; De Benedictis GM; Cerruto MA; Artibani W
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Apr; 16(2):439-447. PubMed ID: 27638708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical analysis of the interaction phenomena between artificial urinary sphincter and urethral duct.
    Natali AN; Fontanella CG; Carniel EL
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Mar; 36(3):e3308. PubMed ID: 31945261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interaction phenomena between a cuff of an artificial urinary sphincter and a urethral phantom.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Fontanella CG
    Artif Organs; 2019 Sep; 43(9):888-896. PubMed ID: 30868625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of interaction phenomena between lower urinary tract and artificial urinary sphincter in consideration of urethral tissues degeneration.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Fontanella CG
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Dec; 19(6):2099-2109. PubMed ID: 32363532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental investigation of the biomechanics of urethral tissues and structures.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Frigo A; Pavan PG; Todros S; Pachera P; Fontanella CG; Rubini A; Cavicchioli L; Avital Y; De Benedictis GM
    Exp Physiol; 2016 May; 101(5):641-56. PubMed ID: 26864993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conformation and mechanics of the polymeric cuff of artificial urinary sphincter.
    Natali AN; Fontanella CG; Todros S; Pavan PG; Carmignato S; Zanini F; Carniel EL
    Math Biosci Eng; 2020 May; 17(4):3894-3908. PubMed ID: 32987559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In silico assessment of the reliability and performance of artificial sphincter for urinary incontinence.
    Mascolini MV; Carniel EL
    Artif Organs; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38895983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of occlusion methods for artificial sphincters.
    Marziale L; Lucarini G; Mazzocchi T; Ricotti L; Menciassi A
    Artif Organs; 2020 Sep; 44(9):995-1005. PubMed ID: 32216102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size, and its effect on postoperative incontinence.
    Rothschild J; Chang Kit L; Seltz L; Wang L; Kaufman M; Dmochowski R; Milam DF
    J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 23820053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Impact of Urethral Risk Factors on Transcorporeal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion Rates and Device Survival.
    Mock S; Dmochowski RR; Brown ET; Reynolds WS; Kaufman MR; Milam DF
    J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26141851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Addition of a second urethral cuff to enhance performance of the artificial urinary sphincter.
    Kabalin JN
    J Urol; 1996 Oct; 156(4):1302-4. PubMed ID: 8808859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental evaluation of an electromechanical artificial urinary sphincter in an animal model.
    Valerio M; Jichlinski P; Dahlem R; Tozzi P; Mundy AR
    BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E337-43. PubMed ID: 23305222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy.
    Guralnick ML; Miller E; Toh KL; Webster GD
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2075-8; discussion 2079. PubMed ID: 11956443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development and evolution of artificial urethral sphincters.
    Hajivassiliou CA
    J Med Eng Technol; 1998; 22(4):154-9. PubMed ID: 9680598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The role of low urethral mucosal and submucosal blood perfusion in patients with artificial urinary sphincters].
    García Montes F; Mundy AR; Knight SI; Craggs MD
    Actas Urol Esp; 2007 May; 31(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 17711166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement.
    Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Elliott DS
    Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28128901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter placement: is cuff downsizing effective?
    Saffarian A; Walsh K; Walsh IK; Stone AR
    J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):567-9. PubMed ID: 12544308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial urinary sphincter implantation using a bulbous urethral cuff: perioperative care.
    Elliott DS; Barrett DM
    Urol Nurs; 2000 Apr; 20(2):89-90, 95-8. PubMed ID: 11998129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.